From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@wanadoo.es>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ips driver for 2.4.23-pre4
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:30:23 +0100
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <3FFDAFCF.3000908@wanadoo.es>
References: <3FFC5B2C.6000302@wanadoo.es>	 <20040108171531.B12595@infradead.org> <3FFD9F0E.4060604@wanadoo.es>	 <20040108182135.A13623@infradead.org>  <3FFDA639.7090005@wanadoo.es> <1073588778.4429.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp12.eresmas.com ([62.81.235.112]:43990 "EHLO
	smtp12.eresmas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265928AbUAHTbn
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:31:43 -0500
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: arjanv@redhat.com
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>

Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> who (at least in the RH case) often say "get it in upstream kernel
> first".

that is a recent policy for _Fedora_. Or tell me why RHEL kernel
patches are so big ;-)