From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E55C4332F for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 12:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233785AbjADMiO (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 07:38:14 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56984 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239246AbjADMhs (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 07:37:48 -0500 Received: from esa1.hgst.iphmx.com (esa1.hgst.iphmx.com [68.232.141.245]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A8113F0C for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 04:37:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1672835862; x=1704371862; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FnrCvyGU8eSnbHP81ntl0TkHG/Rndm8KPRS5Mzaqcrg=; b=O9kKtEAvAMIog5llAG9u5TE5iHO7Sfou6ROzaeZ98UBiq1APpTfdONbq 0w/UR8cgL5XreFW9LCzHQodPWT7wBH5p5nItPUbAvfFkkQHsqL81L0yeO XbE9OtxA+cRaxIgY7C1QaCcyUqCZYrmMW3zZZX5c6cuhlNNZcbNAT3Y+h O75Nh/3QnOs09t5agPu5upyGiK6xREmsoSQLrYn+6LsVVQlGEQHhiIqWA dK8KFGbAE9hVYUToKzCLxLrKWxxkzpWevqqJIQeeOYtUrF51pY4mYx4Nb WzYmcalOhuwdsUDM2NFzezuUJEEYEQ2ukItuAbVU6fw+k24jWedH29vas A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,299,1665417600"; d="scan'208";a="332005533" Received: from h199-255-45-14.hgst.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.14]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2023 20:37:41 +0800 IronPort-SDR: hoMfL/HGFAfOFuHMYMCY6B5XzRve2lRzP3VEed6LQyTLsPYZdkjf3Lxxw5T5quGEI9LEWXGGhb x0BUM78TEpCR5bGcK5KJyUYfSEZO3pJyyJ3Y0WpZ4Skr0ZQ7j54o5gyiLN2DI360jltObCwD1z igwCEpqs6vkUZczyZWPmlRlUv2HtHfkU0WJQzZVZZ3g9ExchmdUHf5vCyQoaDWvQC5j+yaWKiq BRhnQnkIR9sCySe2tS0NhfAQgA+OOmrop6enZ9vpSh7PveSmuY5STv9DUUoRyvTgE+8EXtfB+M 8f8= Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 04 Jan 2023 03:55:38 -0800 IronPort-SDR: eP7DDWWOsVUjjjNjANuEDW+9O9vpj+AgxIMB4hl8PnEVAEIxYZTXA2b9cyF5T9QMLxBf3pLkRZ /FNQj9HOfnk5w3ZN5wdp/xdIq7ZGhjdaPvdk0aWWFix/cA48vLdp/qSbrjhAdVuJVgtVayEG5R xFxZhS56Ox8Vm5SbIOI3MNXHNbre7gq1KJxxFB+AWoPwV/9kGJOZBhGTwjjGyX8Uc20S9iHEcl P1dwwcZzszMIV1sOct847k5BMu4l4OJtNx5J21ensLDQ+PwYx04AH/m/9zdaFIWmz2qrm1Az/5 FWw= WDCIronportException: Internal Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([10.3.10.180]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 04 Jan 2023 04:37:42 -0800 Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Nn8JP2VSjz1Rwrq for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 04:37:41 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=opensource.wdc.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= opensource.wdc.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :in-reply-to:organization:from:references:to:content-language :subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; s=dkim; t= 1672835860; x=1675427861; bh=FnrCvyGU8eSnbHP81ntl0TkHG/Rndm8KPRS 5Mzaqcrg=; b=S3Oa2SKPsXtscIo1kzIO1m8vSr9fg+0g0MBrhfUGdO6XRuYXqQZ 5OHQTiL9g0BhY0GpZ41iJ6fcIOk9UMaClrfRJE32NzajeLysMdWEfDxLRJj/33x6 eZrzrkdinp8OKRHc1vj3rwvWKw3Fg2EnEY0pVDOrngSNsUTPz1j/Rmd0lmhk0fWj pH5jqVfliWAa2Aeg4enaFfobotZPkQld35eerZOzuf9q+dDGxg724A+8C6BGJigQ +j2y+HHEycpyHe3D0el/kEhBKknPnBXu5LZY/nlefpIGWSXgLa9jb/0Tsu5cM1FL vOYx1Fxz/3j0TGbGz0r9nobDQCnIe2SlN9w== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id fPUpajPs4JyD for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 04:37:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.225.163.5] (unknown [10.225.163.5]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Nn8JM3jKgz1RvLy; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 04:37:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3fa9835f-62d3-70f0-d4a2-57dd429029d9@opensource.wdc.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 21:37:38 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] misc libata improvements Content-Language: en-US To: Niklas Cassel Cc: Mikael Pettersson , Brian King , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" References: <20221229170005.49118-1-niklas.cassel@wdc.com> <49c92e50-5452-8c3e-1517-a0bb1e4e72a0@opensource.wdc.com> From: Damien Le Moal Organization: Western Digital Research In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 1/4/23 19:16, Niklas Cassel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 01:43:54PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: >>> On 12/30/22 01:59, Niklas Cassel wrote: >>>> Hello there, >>>> >>>> This series contains misc libata improvements. >>>> >>>> These improvements were identified while developing support for Command >>>> Duration Limits (CDL). All patches in this series (i.e. V1 of these >>>> patches) were orignally sent out as part of the CDL series, found here: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/510732e0-7962-cf54-c22c-f1d7066895f5@opensource.wdc.com/T/ >>>> >>>> However, as these improvements are completely unrelated to CDL, they can >>>> be merged independently, and should not need to wait for other patches. >>> >>> Applied the series to for-6.3. Patch 1 had a small conflict that I fixed >>> up. Thanks ! >> >> I had a look at the SHA1 for this patch in your tree, and it looks good. >> >> However, patches 2/7, 3/7, 4/7, 7/7 seem to miss your chain sign-off. > > Is this perhaps because checkpatch complains if the same sign-off exists > twice on the same patch? > > Not sure if this should be ignored or not... > To me, it seems more important to keep a record of the chain, > than to keep checkpatch happy, but I could be wrong here.. I do not sign again patches that already have my SoB. linux-next build bot will complain if I forget signing patches I apply, but it does not seem that the order matters... Not entirely certain about the correct practice with that though. > > > Kind regards, > Niklas -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research