public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, gibbs@scsiguy.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow drivers to hook into watchdog timeout
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:00:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <400D5E9F.8030802@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040120132052.GA6740@lst.de

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We all know talk is cheap, so here's a first draft patch to allow LLDDs
> to get control first after a command timeout.  Justin, does this look
> okay for you?  BTW, your drivers are the last ones using scsi_add_timer
> from outside the midlayer, if we could get rid of that we'd be able to
> keep the interface private.

If we get rid of scsi_add_timer, could we have a scsi_mod_timer? In the 
ipr driver I submitted, I would like to be able to simply double the 
timeout value, I don't necessarily want to change the timeout policy. 
The adapter firmware is already timing each command, so I would like to 
use that as the primary timing mechanism if possible.

For normal SCSI devices under this adapter I could change the philosophy 
and not let the adapter time the commands, but for disk array devices, 
the timeout value for reads/writes is too short.


-- 
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-20 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-20 13:20 [PATCH] allow drivers to hook into watchdog timeout Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-20 15:53 ` Mike Anderson
2004-01-20 16:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-20 16:47     ` Mike Anderson
2004-01-22 13:59       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-22 14:27         ` Justin T. Gibbs
2004-01-20 17:00 ` Brian King [this message]
2004-01-20 18:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-10 16:34 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2004-02-10 16:42   ` James Bottomley
2004-02-10 17:47     ` Justin T. Gibbs
2004-02-10 18:41       ` James Bottomley
2004-02-10 19:44         ` Justin T. Gibbs
2004-02-10 20:05           ` James Bottomley
2004-02-10 20:26             ` Justin T. Gibbs
2004-02-10 22:47               ` Clay Haapala
2004-02-11 20:05               ` James Bottomley
2004-02-12  0:15                 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2004-02-12 14:42                   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=400D5E9F.8030802@us.ibm.com \
    --to=brking@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=gibbs@scsiguy.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox