From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: christophe varoqui Subject: Re: Removing the qlogicfc driver Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 17:52:39 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <401D2ED7.2060807@free.fr> References: <1074606124.400d302cac80e@imp2-l.free.fr> <20040201160934.A15908@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.26]:1365 "EHLO mwinf0502.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265365AbUBAQwm (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 11:52:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20040201160934.A15908@infradead.org> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:42:04PM +0100, christophe.varoqui@free.fr wrote: > >>>Please let me know how it works out for you. I'd like to forward >>>it along for inclusion once I get a bit more internal runtime in my >>>rings. >>> >> >>I report it works flawlessly with "2.6.0-udm5 (== mm2) + qla8b8 + patch". > > > This means there are no other objections and we can remove driver? > If the SNS patch from A. Vasquez gets in, yes, no objections. Thanks for caring, cvaroqui