From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix aic7xxx del_timer_sync() deadlock Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:44:12 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <4042410C.7070701@pobox.com> References: <1077906383.2157.98.camel@mulgrave> <3462370000.1077909838@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <403FFF86.90302@pobox.com> <20040228092512.GD923@suse.de> <4041292C.3090700@pobox.com> <20040229091350.GC3149@suse.de> <137982704.1078081053@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <404236C1.5000001@pobox.com> <156412704.1078082931@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <40423F7B.4020102@pobox.com> <162922704.1078083749@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:23760 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262123AbUB2ToY (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:44:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <162922704.1078083749@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: Jens Axboe , James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List , Andrew Morton Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >>>Exactly. The block layer shouldn't be involved in this at all. In the >>>particular case I was talking about, busy or queue full with no I/O pending, > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > >>Agreed for busy. >> >>But queue full? > > > Some SCSI devices send Queue Full instead of Busy in the case of > a "busy" condition with no I/O pending. Gotcha, thanks. Jeff