From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xose Vazquez Perez Subject: Re: ADAPTEC 2.4 drivers too old Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:17:25 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <40535E45.10102@wanadoo.es> References: <405351A5.3010708@wanadoo.es> <1079203519.4446.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <40535C61.1020408@wanadoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp14.eresmas.com ([62.81.235.114]:3544 "EHLO smtp14.eresmas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263166AbUCMTR4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:17:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <40535C61.1020408@wanadoo.es> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: arjanv@redhat.com, 'linux-scsi' Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >> I object to the words "too old" in your subject. >> The reality is that 2.4 doesn't have the brand-spanking-newest driver >> version *numbers*. So what? Newer != automatically better. > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107456492323846&w=2 > > "... and left at least the aic79xx driver in a worse state than it > was in before ..." > there are more examples.... Do you call to aacraid stable driver ? ask to Dell 2650 owners: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92129 http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-aacraid-devel/