From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Smietanowski Subject: Bug#239952: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL? Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:53:54 +0100 Message-ID: <40636302.6080807@stesmi.com> References: <20040325082949.GA3376@gondor.apana.org.au> <20040325220803.GZ16746@fs.tum.de> <40635DD9.8090809@pobox.com> Reply-To: Stefan Smietanowski , 239952@bugs.debian.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <40635DD9.8090809@pobox.com> List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Adrian Bunk , 239952@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Well IANAL, but it seems not so cut-n-dried, at least. > > Firmware is a program that executes on another processor, so no linking > is taking place at all. It is analagous to shipping a binary-only > program in your initrd, IMO. Except the firmware itself is GPL in this case. // Stefan