From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian King Subject: Re: sym2 probs in bk-scsi tree Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 10:51:26 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <407574FE.1020800@us.ibm.com> References: <20040407231820.66dd76cd.akpm@osdl.org> <20040408145700.GB18329@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <40756CB3.5010902@us.ibm.com> <20040408154045.GD18329@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.106]:55978 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261979AbUDHPvo (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 11:51:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20040408154045.GD18329@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:16:03AM -0500, Brian King wrote: > >>>They certainly are scary. What is device 15 on this scsi bus? This >>>looks like domain validation being applied to a device that can't do it >>>to me. Did I get that right, James? >> >>Looks like a SES to me. Would it make sense to not log errors during >>domain validation? > > > I was thinking more about disabling domain validation towards these > kinds of devices ... > That would be a resonable thing to do as well, performance to SES devices is really not an issue. -Brian