From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: sg driver and Fedora Core 2
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 13:58:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B8CF34.6080901@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1085852299.2004.206.camel@mulgrave>
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 12:27, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>Really what needs to happen is a generic userland tap attaches to a
>>chrdev, issues an ioctl(2) to attach to a request_queue, and then does
>>read(2)/write(2)/mmap(2) to communicate with the request_queue.
>>
>>:)
>>
>>Call it /dev/bsg, or somesuch.
>
>
> Well, this touches on something else I'm thinking about: lazy
> attachment. In multi thousand disc environments, you don't want us
> wasting resources allocating a queue and reading a partition table for
> all of them; you really only want to do that for the devices you're
> actually going to use. Once we have this, I think dual attachment will
> be a dead issue.
Regardless of lazy attachment, request_queues need to support multiple
simultaneous producers of struct request's.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-29 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-28 14:05 sg driver and Fedora Core 2 Douglas Gilbert
2004-05-28 14:18 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-28 14:28 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-28 17:25 ` Alan Cox
2004-05-29 15:55 ` James Bottomley
2004-05-29 15:57 ` Alan Cox
2004-05-29 16:07 ` James Bottomley
2004-05-29 16:29 ` Alan Cox
2004-05-29 16:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-29 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2004-05-29 17:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-05-29 16:49 ` James Bottomley
2004-05-29 16:56 ` Alan Cox
2004-05-29 17:28 ` James Bottomley
2004-05-29 17:38 ` Alan Cox
2004-05-29 17:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-29 17:29 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-30 10:37 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-05-30 10:41 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-07 8:56 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-05-29 17:35 ` Alan Cox
2004-05-29 17:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-29 17:38 ` James Bottomley
2004-05-29 17:46 ` Alan Cox
2004-05-29 17:58 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-05-30 10:20 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-29 16:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-28 17:39 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40B8CF34.6080901@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox