From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Emoore@lsil.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sg.c to set direction more reliably (was Re: [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 02:54:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40CE9D31.6050606@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040615060811.GA178857@sgi.com>
Jeremy Higdon wrote:
> +static int
> +sg_direction(char *cmnd)
> +{
> + switch (cmnd[0]) {
> + /* _DATA_OUT commands */
> + case WRITE_6: case WRITE_10: case WRITE_12:
> + case WRITE_16:
> + case WRITE_LONG: case WRITE_SAME: case WRITE_BUFFER:
> + case WRITE_VERIFY: case WRITE_VERIFY_12:
> + case COMPARE: case COPY: case COPY_VERIFY:
> + case SEARCH_EQUAL: case SEARCH_HIGH: case SEARCH_LOW:
> + case SEARCH_EQUAL_12: case SEARCH_HIGH_12: case SEARCH_LOW_12:
> + case MODE_SELECT: case MODE_SELECT_10: case LOG_SELECT:
> + case SEND_DIAGNOSTIC: case CHANGE_DEFINITION: case UPDATE_BLOCK:
> + case SET_WINDOW: case MEDIUM_SCAN: case SEND_VOLUME_TAG:
> + case REASSIGN_BLOCKS:
> + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT:
> + case 0xea:
> + case 0xa3:
> + return SG_DXFER_TO_DEV;
> +
> + /* No data transfer commands */
> + case SEEK_6: case SEEK_10:
> + case RESERVE: case RELEASE:
> + case TEST_UNIT_READY:
> + case START_STOP:
> + case ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL:
> + return SG_DXFER_NONE;
> +
> + /* Conditional data transfer commands */
> + case FORMAT_UNIT:
> + if (cmnd[1] & 0x10) /* FmtData (data out phase)? */
> + return SG_DXFER_TO_DEV;
> + else
> + return SG_DXFER_NONE;
> +
> + case VERIFY:
> + if (cmnd[1] & 0x02) /* VERIFY:BYTCHK (data out phase)? */
> + return SG_DXFER_TO_DEV;
> + else
> + return SG_DXFER_NONE;
> +
> + case RESERVE_10:
> + if (cmnd[1] & 0x03) /* RESERVE:{LongID|Extent} (data out phase)? */
> + return SG_DXFER_TO_DEV;
> + else
> + return SG_DXFER_NONE;
> +
> + /* Must be data _IN! */
> + default:
> + return SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV;
> + }
> +}
This is definitely moving backwards from the direction we want to go.
The entity creating the SCSI command needs to specify data direction,
_not_ tables hardcoded into the kernel. Bart recently removed such a
table from IDE.
These tables are fundamentally broken anyway, due to vendor-reserved
commands where the data directions are not specified, but simply "known"
by the submittor.
If /dev/sg's userland interface does not permit userland to provide the
data direction, then let's just consider it broken and move to Axboe's
bsg post-haste.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-15 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-31 11:52 [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-12 0:36 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-12 3:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-06-12 5:13 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-12 5:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-06-15 6:08 ` [PATCH] sg.c to set direction more reliably (was Re: [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs) Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 6:47 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-06-15 7:41 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 15:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-15 21:34 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 22:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-15 22:15 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-26 7:09 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-26 8:44 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-08-27 1:12 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-27 8:10 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-28 5:08 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-08-28 9:39 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-08-30 7:08 ` [PATCH] sg.c to warn about ambiguous data direction Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 6:54 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-06-15 7:50 ` [PATCH] sg.c to set direction more reliably (was Re: [PATCH] fusion update to current APIs) Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 7:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-15 8:40 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-15 8:48 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 9:10 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 9:31 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-06-15 17:42 ` Patrick Mansfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40CE9D31.6050606@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox