From: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>
To: arjanv@redhat.com
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Flexible timeout infrastructure
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:40:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40CF1852.6030306@adaptec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1087313241.2710.40.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
> to me it somewhat sounds like the wrong approach.
> I'm all for the LLDD to be able to influence the timeout value, but I
> consider it a bad mistake to make every driver reinvent timeout
> *handling*.
This has very little to do with the timeout _value_, and it has
all to do with *recovery* which is a beast on its own as far as transport
protocols are concerned, especially over non-native interconnects (iSCSI, USB,
RDMA). I believe I did mention this at the end of the text.
(mea culpa it was kind of a long text)
--
Luben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-15 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-15 15:02 [PATCH]: Flexible timeout infrastructure Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 15:08 ` Signed-off-by: added [Re: [PATCH]: Flexible timeout infrastructure] Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 15:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-06-15 15:27 ` [PATCH]: Flexible timeout infrastructure Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-15 15:40 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2004-06-15 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-15 15:46 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-15 15:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-15 15:48 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 15:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-15 16:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-15 16:24 ` Doug Ledford
2004-06-15 16:27 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 16:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-15 18:07 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 15:31 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-15 18:15 ` Mike Anderson
2004-06-15 18:37 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 19:20 ` Mike Anderson
2004-06-15 19:52 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 20:57 ` Mike Anderson
2004-06-15 22:00 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 22:31 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 22:13 ` Doug Ledford
2004-06-15 19:12 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-15 19:54 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-16 15:27 ` Mike Anderson
2004-06-16 15:37 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-16 15:48 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-16 15:58 ` James Bottomley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-16 16:58 Smart, James
2004-06-16 17:04 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-16 18:58 ` Luben Tuikov
2004-06-16 19:17 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-16 17:10 Smart, James
2004-06-16 17:21 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-16 17:33 Smart, James
2004-06-16 17:38 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-16 18:05 Smart, James
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40CF1852.6030306@adaptec.com \
--to=luben_tuikov@adaptec.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox