From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bunk@fs.tum.de
Subject: Is scsi_cmnd::underflow still useful?
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:40:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40F2E93B.3040607@torque.net> (raw)
Doesn't look like many LLDs act on scsi_cmnd::underflow.
Seems to me that scsi_cmnd::resid is a more general
replacement.
Comments?
Doug Gilbert
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-12 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-12 19:40 Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2004-07-13 0:55 ` Is scsi_cmnd::underflow still useful? James Bottomley
2004-07-13 5:09 ` Matthew Dharm
2004-07-13 22:09 ` Douglas Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40F2E93B.3040607@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox