public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SCSI sg: Questions regarding jiffies usage
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:11:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40F31ABA.1060709@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040712224629.GY4701@fs.tum.de>

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:35:06PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> 
<snip/>

>>>In function sg_new_write:
>>>  timeout = sg_ms_to_jif(srp->header.timeout);
>>>How is it possible that srp->header.timeout isn't already
>>>in jiffies?
>>
>>The sg_new_write() function is invoked when the sg_io_hdr
>>interface structure is used (compared with the older
>>sg_header structure). The unit of the timeout in the
>>sg_io_hdr structure is milliseconds [which is probably
>>overkill]. The mid level wants timeouts in jiffies.
> 
> 
> As far as I can see, timeout is set in two places:
> 
> sg_add_sfp:
>   sfp->timeout = SG_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
> 
> sg_ioctl:
>   sfp->timeout = MULDIV (val, HZ, USER_HZ);
> 
> Isn't timeout set to jiffies in both places?
> 
Adrian,
There may be some confusion here. The older struct
sg_header interface did not have explicit per command timeouts.
As a poor substitute an ioctl was added to associate
a timeout (in seconds) to the file descriptor. This way
subsequent commands issued via that file descriptor
got the new timeout value. This is the "sfp->timeout"
value. The snippets above show the "sfp->timeout"
value being set to a default when a sg device is opened
and then being changed after a SG_SET_TIMEOUT ioctl call.

The newer sg_io_hdr interface has per command timeouts
(in milliseconds). A sg_io_hdr::timeout value overrides
the "sfp->timeout" value. In the above code the
sg_io_hdr::timeout value is in "srp->header.timeout".

Doug Gilbert



  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-12 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-11  0:41 SCSI sg: Questions regarding jiffies usage Adrian Bunk
2004-07-12 19:35 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-07-12 22:46   ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-12 23:11     ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2004-07-12 23:59       ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40F31ABA.1060709@torque.net \
    --to=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox