From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let AIC7{9,X}XX_BUILD_FIRMWARE depend on!PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 13:49:41 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <410FD035.6080905@adaptec.com> References: <20040801185543.GB2746@fs.tum.de> <20040801191118.GA7402@mars.ravnborg.org> <410FA577.4040602@adaptec.com> <410FBDAA.4070907@optonline.net> <1091550985.2816.10.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from magic.adaptec.com ([216.52.22.17]:4829 "EHLO magic.adaptec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266768AbUHCRtz (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:49:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1091550985.2816.10.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: arjanv@redhat.com Cc: Nathan Bryant , Sam Ravnborg , "Justin T. Gibbs" , Adrian Bunk , James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 18:30, Nathan Bryant wrote: > >>Luben Tuikov wrote: >> >>>Hi Sam, >>> >>>You can forward it to Linus and I'll also integrate it >>>to the latest version of the drivers, yet to be integrated >>>to the mainline kernel. >> >>Luben - >> >>Are the latest drivers going to be available in BitKeeper format before >>they get merged? > > > I'm sure they'll be submitted in small incremental updates which can be > submitted and merged in smaller pieces to keep testability to a > maximum.... Yes, no problem. Whatever you guys want. I can provide small incremental patches (right out of perforce), and generate incremantal BKs (will have to look into that). -- Luben