From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: brking@us.ibm.com
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] p00001_scsi_tcq_queue_lock
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:14:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <411786DF.2040009@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4117846B.7030302@us.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1382 bytes --]
Oops. I guess this was the actual patch I sent.
Brian King wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 10:49, Brian King wrote:
>>
>>> Add locking to scsi_activate_tcq and scsi_deactivate_tcq to fix a race
>>> condition that can occur when disabling tcqing with commands in flight.
>>
>>
>>
>> It's possible to do it like this. However, we should really quiesce the
>> SCSI device before disabling tcq. It is not legal in the scsi spec to
>> have both tagged and untagged commands outstanding. Most drives do the
>> right thing and return BUSY to an untagged request if they have tags in
>> flight.
>
>
> Ok. I agree that we do not want both tagged and untagged requests going
> to the device. In the case of the ipr driver, the adapter microcode
> handles this for me. If there are tagged requests outstanding to a
> device and an untagged request is sent, the tagged requests must first
> finish, then the untagged request is sent to the device with no other
> requests outstanding.
>
>> Also, we have to wait until all tags return before freeing the
>> block layer tag structures...and there's always the devices that do
>> strange things in this situation...
>
>
> I sent the following patch to Jens last week as well and he applied it.
> This fixes the free problem you mention.
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
[-- Attachment #2: blk_queue_free_tags.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2920 bytes --]
Currently blk_queue_free_tags cannot be called with ops outstanding. The
scsi_tcq API defined to LLD scsi drivers allows for scsi_deactivate_tcq
to be called (which calls blk_queue_free_tags) with ops outstanding. Change
blk_queue_free_tags to no longer free the tags, but rather just disable
tagged queuing and also modify blk_queue_init_tags to handle re-enabling
tagged queuing after it has been disabled.
Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
---
linux-2.6.8-rc2-bjking1/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c~blk_queue_free_tags drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c
--- linux-2.6.8-rc2/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c~blk_queue_free_tags 2004-08-03 10:53:50.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-bjking1/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2004-08-03 11:05:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -482,15 +482,14 @@ struct request *blk_queue_find_tag(reque
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_find_tag);
/**
- * blk_queue_free_tags - release tag maintenance info
+ * _blk_queue_free_tags - release tag maintenance info
* @q: the request queue for the device
*
* Notes:
* blk_cleanup_queue() will take care of calling this function, if tagging
- * has been used. So there's usually no need to call this directly, unless
- * tagging is just being disabled but the queue remains in function.
+ * has been used. So there's no need to call this directly.
**/
-void blk_queue_free_tags(request_queue_t *q)
+static void _blk_queue_free_tags(request_queue_t *q)
{
struct blk_queue_tag *bqt = q->queue_tags;
@@ -514,6 +513,19 @@ void blk_queue_free_tags(request_queue_t
q->queue_flags &= ~(1 << QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED);
}
+/**
+ * blk_queue_free_tags - release tag maintenance info
+ * @q: the request queue for the device
+ *
+ * Notes:
+ * This is used to disabled tagged queuing to a device, yet leave
+ * queue in function.
+ **/
+void blk_queue_free_tags(request_queue_t *q)
+{
+ clear_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED, &q->queue_flags);
+}
+
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_free_tags);
static int
@@ -564,13 +576,22 @@ fail:
int blk_queue_init_tags(request_queue_t *q, int depth,
struct blk_queue_tag *tags)
{
- if (!tags) {
+ int rc;
+
+ BUG_ON(tags && q->queue_tags && tags != q->queue_tags);
+
+ if (!tags && !q->queue_tags) {
tags = kmalloc(sizeof(struct blk_queue_tag), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!tags)
goto fail;
if (init_tag_map(q, tags, depth))
goto fail;
+ } else if (q->queue_tags) {
+ if ((rc = blk_queue_resize_tags(q, depth)))
+ return rc;
+ set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED, &q->queue_flags);
+ return 0;
} else
atomic_inc(&tags->refcnt);
@@ -1333,8 +1354,8 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(request_queue_t *
if (rl->rq_pool)
mempool_destroy(rl->rq_pool);
- if (blk_queue_tagged(q))
- blk_queue_free_tags(q);
+ if (q->queue_tags)
+ _blk_queue_free_tags(q);
kmem_cache_free(requestq_cachep, q);
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-09 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-03 17:49 [PATCH] p00001_scsi_tcq_queue_lock Brian King
2004-08-07 4:09 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-09 14:04 ` Brian King
2004-08-09 14:14 ` Brian King [this message]
2004-09-17 17:55 ` Brian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=411786DF.2040009@us.ibm.com \
--to=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).