From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: [rant] can we get asane ic7xxx/79xx probing _please_ Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 09:44:35 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <413F0CC3.4020408@adaptec.com> References: <20040906182402.GA25103@lst.de> <413F01C3.9020202@adaptec.com> <20040908130340.GA27693@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from magic.adaptec.com ([216.52.22.17]:21669 "EHLO magic.adaptec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269144AbUIHNoo (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:44:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20040908130340.GA27693@lst.de> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 08:57:39AM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote: > >>Hi Christoph, >> >>Thanks for bringing this up. I do have Andi's patch in the pending list, >>and would like to apply it to the newer version of the driver. >> >>I should mention that while the newer drivers do not quite have >>the PCI tables as presented in Andi's patch, they do check the return >>value of pci_module_init() and return the appropriate result. > > > Luben, please stop that new version of the driver stuff. Your job as > a maintainer is to keep the driver in the kernel working, and your the > steering point for getting right fixes in fast in a controlled way, the > last thing we need is driver "releases" that batch up unrelated changes > and are delayed forever. > > So is Andi's (and my later fix okay) and can James apply them or not? Yes they are okay and James can apply them. Luben