* [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size
@ 2004-08-19 23:02 brking
2004-10-13 14:01 ` Brian King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: brking @ 2004-08-19 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James.Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi, brking
The following BUG() was observed when a scsi disk formatted to 522 bytes/sector
was discovered attached to a sym2 adapter.
<2>kernel BUG in grow_buffers at fs/buffer.c:1271!
which corresponds to:
static inline int
grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
{
struct page *page;
pgoff_t index;
int sizebits;
/* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
if (size & (bdev_hardsect_size(bdev)-1))
BUG();
if (size < 512 || size > PAGE_SIZE)
BUG(); <----- line 1271 is here
The following patch fixes this by not attempting to read the partition table
of a device with an unsupported sector size.
Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
---
linux-2.6.8.1-bjking1/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/scsi/scsicam.c~scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size drivers/scsi/scsicam.c
--- linux-2.6.8.1/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c~scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size 2004-08-17 11:28:31.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.8.1-bjking1/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-08-17 11:33:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -29,7 +29,10 @@ unsigned char *scsi_bios_ptable(struct b
unsigned char *res = kmalloc(66, GFP_KERNEL);
if (res) {
struct block_device *bdev = dev->bd_contains;
- struct buffer_head *bh = __bread(bdev, 0, block_size(bdev));
+ struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
+
+ if (get_capacity(bdev->bd_disk))
+ bh = __bread(bdev, 0, block_size(bdev));
if (bh) {
memcpy(res, bh->b_data + 0x1be, 66);
brelse(bh);
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size
2004-08-19 23:02 [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size brking
@ 2004-10-13 14:01 ` Brian King
2004-10-13 14:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brian King @ 2004-10-13 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brking; +Cc: James.Bottomley, linux-scsi
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 116 bytes --]
This patch appears to have been dropped. Resending.
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
[-- Attachment #2: scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1606 bytes --]
The following BUG() was observed when a scsi disk formatted to 522 bytes/sector
was discovered attached to a sym2 adapter.
<2>kernel BUG in grow_buffers at fs/buffer.c:1271!
which corresponds to:
static inline int
grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
{
struct page *page;
pgoff_t index;
int sizebits;
/* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
if (size & (bdev_hardsect_size(bdev)-1))
BUG();
if (size < 512 || size > PAGE_SIZE)
BUG(); <----- line 1271 is here
The following patch fixes this by not attempting to read the partition table
of a device with an unsupported sector size.
Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
---
linux-2.6.9-rc4-bk1-bjking1/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/scsi/scsicam.c~scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size drivers/scsi/scsicam.c
--- linux-2.6.9-rc4-bk1/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c~scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size 2004-10-13 08:57:46.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc4-bk1-bjking1/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-10-13 08:57:46.000000000 -0500
@@ -29,7 +29,10 @@ unsigned char *scsi_bios_ptable(struct b
unsigned char *res = kmalloc(66, GFP_KERNEL);
if (res) {
struct block_device *bdev = dev->bd_contains;
- struct buffer_head *bh = __bread(bdev, 0, block_size(bdev));
+ struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
+
+ if (get_capacity(bdev->bd_disk))
+ bh = __bread(bdev, 0, block_size(bdev));
if (bh) {
memcpy(res, bh->b_data + 0x1be, 66);
brelse(bh);
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size
2004-10-13 14:01 ` Brian King
@ 2004-10-13 14:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-13 14:25 ` Brian King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2004-10-13 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian King; +Cc: James.Bottomley, linux-scsi
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:01:26AM -0500, Brian King wrote:
> grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
> {
> struct page *page;
> pgoff_t index;
> int sizebits;
>
> /* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
> if (size & (bdev_hardsect_size(bdev)-1))
> BUG();
> if (size < 512 || size > PAGE_SIZE)
> BUG(); <----- line 1271 is here
What tree is this in? Neither of these BUG()s appear in 2.6.9-rc4.
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size
2004-10-13 14:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2004-10-13 14:25 ` Brian King
2004-10-13 15:45 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brian King @ 2004-10-13 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Wilcox; +Cc: James.Bottomley, linux-scsi
Looks like the code in fs/buffer.c has changed since I originally submitted this.
The BUG()s appear to have been moved directly into __getblk_slow. The patch is
still appropriate and needed, but the text at the beginning is now incorrect.
Here was the backtrace of the original failure.
GPR24: C0000000CCC9BB00 C0000000CF7B3C20 0000000000001050 0000000000001050
GPR28: 0000000000000000 C0000000CCC9BB00 C0000000005E1480 C0000000CCC9BB00
NIP [c0000000000c479c] .__getblk_slow+0xa8/0x484
LR [c0000000000c474c] .__getblk_slow+0x58/0x484
Call Trace:
[c0000000cf7b3520] [c0000000000c474c] .__getblk_slow+0x58/0x484 (unreliable)
[c0000000cf7b35e0] [c0000000000c4bdc] .__getblk+0x64/0x6c
[c0000000cf7b3680] [c0000000000c7b3c] .__bread+0x20/0x14c
[c0000000cf7b3710] [d000000000098044] .scsi_bios_ptable+0x50/0xd4 [scsi_mod]
[c0000000cf7b37a0] [d0000000000980f8] .scsicam_bios_param+0x30/0x18c [scsi_mod]
[c0000000cf7b3840] [d000000000063118] .sd_ioctl+0x240/0x274 [sd_mod]
[c0000000cf7b38f0] [c000000000258a64] .blkdev_ioctl+0xd0/0x9e4
[c0000000cf7b3a50] [c0000000000cbbc8] .block_ioctl+0x18/0x2c
[c0000000cf7b3ad0] [c0000000000dd3d4] .sys_ioctl+0x450/0x690
[c0000000cf7b3bb0] [c00000000002715c] .hdio_getgeo+0x40/0xcc
[c0000000cf7b3c50] [c0000000000fc57c] .compat_sys_ioctl+0x178/0x32c
[c0000000cf7b3d10] [c00000000001045c] .ret_from_syscall_1+0x0/0xa4
-Brian
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:01:26AM -0500, Brian King wrote:
>
>>grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
>>{
>> struct page *page;
>> pgoff_t index;
>> int sizebits;
>>
>> /* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
>> if (size & (bdev_hardsect_size(bdev)-1))
>> BUG();
>> if (size < 512 || size > PAGE_SIZE)
>> BUG(); <----- line 1271 is here
>
>
> What tree is this in? Neither of these BUG()s appear in 2.6.9-rc4.
>
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size
2004-10-13 14:25 ` Brian King
@ 2004-10-13 15:45 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-13 19:55 ` Brian King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2004-10-13 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brking; +Cc: Matthew Wilcox, SCSI Mailing List, dwmw2
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 09:25, Brian King wrote:
> Looks like the code in fs/buffer.c has changed since I originally submitted this.
> The BUG()s appear to have been moved directly into __getblk_slow. The patch is
> still appropriate and needed, but the text at the beginning is now incorrect.
> Here was the backtrace of the original failure.
>
>
> GPR24: C0000000CCC9BB00 C0000000CF7B3C20 0000000000001050 0000000000001050
> GPR28: 0000000000000000 C0000000CCC9BB00 C0000000005E1480 C0000000CCC9BB00
> NIP [c0000000000c479c] .__getblk_slow+0xa8/0x484
> LR [c0000000000c474c] .__getblk_slow+0x58/0x484
> Call Trace:
> [c0000000cf7b3520] [c0000000000c474c] .__getblk_slow+0x58/0x484 (unreliable)
> [c0000000cf7b35e0] [c0000000000c4bdc] .__getblk+0x64/0x6c
> [c0000000cf7b3680] [c0000000000c7b3c] .__bread+0x20/0x14c
> [c0000000cf7b3710] [d000000000098044] .scsi_bios_ptable+0x50/0xd4 [scsi_mod]
> [c0000000cf7b37a0] [d0000000000980f8] .scsicam_bios_param+0x30/0x18c [scsi_mod]
> [c0000000cf7b3840] [d000000000063118] .sd_ioctl+0x240/0x274 [sd_mod]
> [c0000000cf7b38f0] [c000000000258a64] .blkdev_ioctl+0xd0/0x9e4
> [c0000000cf7b3a50] [c0000000000cbbc8] .block_ioctl+0x18/0x2c
> [c0000000cf7b3ad0] [c0000000000dd3d4] .sys_ioctl+0x450/0x690
> [c0000000cf7b3bb0] [c00000000002715c] .hdio_getgeo+0x40/0xcc
> [c0000000cf7b3c50] [c0000000000fc57c] .compat_sys_ioctl+0x178/0x32c
> [c0000000cf7b3d10] [c00000000001045c] .ret_from_syscall_1+0x0/0xa4
But this isn't a BUG(). It should be a warning followed by a stack
dump. However, it looks like the correct fix is to get rid of the
__bread() in the cam code.
How does the attached work for you?
James
===== drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 1.16 vs edited =====
--- 1.16/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-06-19 09:45:02 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-10-13 10:38:25 -05:00
@@ -29,10 +29,11 @@
unsigned char *res = kmalloc(66, GFP_KERNEL);
if (res) {
struct block_device *bdev = dev->bd_contains;
- struct buffer_head *bh = __bread(bdev, 0, block_size(bdev));
- if (bh) {
- memcpy(res, bh->b_data + 0x1be, 66);
- brelse(bh);
+ Sector sect;
+ void *data = read_dev_sector(bdev, 0, §);
+ if (data) {
+ memcpy(res, data + 0x1be, 66);
+ put_dev_sector(sect);
} else {
kfree(res);
res = NULL;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size
2004-10-13 15:45 ` James Bottomley
@ 2004-10-13 19:55 ` Brian King
2004-10-13 21:37 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brian King @ 2004-10-13 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: Matthew Wilcox, SCSI Mailing List, dwmw2
James Bottomley wrote:
> But this isn't a BUG(). It should be a warning followed by a stack
> dump. However, it looks like the correct fix is to get rid of the
> __bread() in the cam code.
Looks like the BUG() was removed since I originally submitted this patch. I
recreated the original problem with a 2.6.9-rc2 kernel, which has the
change you mention above. It looks like we now survive the __getblk call
from __bread, but __bread promptly dereferences the NULL bh returned by
__getblk by calling buffer_uptodate and we end up oopsing all the same.
> How does the attached work for you?
Not very well. It looks like it blows up in create_buffers() with this patch.
Since the block size (522) is not a multiple of the host page size, we end up
decrementing offset to a negative number in create_buffers, which then hits a BUG()
in set_bh_page. It looks to me like the block layer assumes the device block size
is a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, in more than one place. Here is the latest backtrace:
cpu 0x7: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c00000003480b240]
pc: c0000000000aba20: .create_empty_buffers+0x30/0x10c
lr: c0000000000aba18: .create_empty_buffers+0x28/0x10c
sp: c00000003480b4c0
msr: 8000000000009032
dar: 0
dsisr: 40000000
current = 0xc0000000345982c0
paca = 0xc000000000465600
pid = 9012, comm = hwscan
7:mon> t
[c00000003480b550] c0000000000afbb0 .block_read_full_page+0x2d4/0x3f8
[c00000003480b670] c0000000000b3bf0 .blkdev_readpage+0x20/0x38
[c00000003480b6f0] c00000000007cf0c .read_cache_page+0xf4/0x25c
[c00000003480b7a0] c0000000000f7d84 .read_dev_sector+0x44/0x148
[c00000003480b830] d000000000080f38 .scsi_bios_ptable+0x50/0xd0 [scsi_mod]
[c00000003480b8d0] d000000000080fe8 .scsicam_bios_param+0x30/0x18c [scsi_mod]
[c00000003480b970] d00000000004b170 .sd_ioctl+0x258/0x28c [sd_mod]
[c00000003480ba30] c000000000249eac .blkdev_ioctl+0xd0/0x9b8
[c00000003480bb90] c0000000000b3c88 .block_ioctl+0x18/0x2c
[c00000003480bc10] c0000000000c3e34 .sys_ioctl+0x3c0/0x5c4
[c00000003480bcd0] c000000000021bb0 .hdio_getgeo+0x40/0xd8
[c00000003480bd70] c0000000000e3438 .compat_sys_ioctl+0x148/0x3dc
[c00000003480be30] c000000000010980 syscall_exit+0x0/0x18
>
> James
>
> ===== drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 1.16 vs edited =====
> --- 1.16/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-06-19 09:45:02 -05:00
> +++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-10-13 10:38:25 -05:00
> @@ -29,10 +29,11 @@
> unsigned char *res = kmalloc(66, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (res) {
> struct block_device *bdev = dev->bd_contains;
> - struct buffer_head *bh = __bread(bdev, 0, block_size(bdev));
> - if (bh) {
> - memcpy(res, bh->b_data + 0x1be, 66);
> - brelse(bh);
> + Sector sect;
> + void *data = read_dev_sector(bdev, 0, §);
> + if (data) {
> + memcpy(res, data + 0x1be, 66);
> + put_dev_sector(sect);
> } else {
> kfree(res);
> res = NULL;
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size
2004-10-13 19:55 ` Brian King
@ 2004-10-13 21:37 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-13 22:57 ` Brian King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2004-10-13 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brking; +Cc: Matthew Wilcox, SCSI Mailing List, dwmw2
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 14:55, Brian King wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > How does the attached work for you?
>
> Not very well. It looks like it blows up in create_buffers() with this patch.
> Since the block size (522) is not a multiple of the host page size, we end up
> decrementing offset to a negative number in create_buffers, which then hits a BUG()
> in set_bh_page. It looks to me like the block layer assumes the device block size
> is a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, in more than one place. Here is the latest backtrace:
OK it seems that we get to bogus block size confusion before we see the
device's zero size. The least nasty fix seems to be to set a power of
two blocksize as well as zeroing the capacity for this problem.
How does the attached fare?
James
===== drivers/scsi/sd.c 1.160 vs edited =====
--- 1.160/drivers/scsi/sd.c 2004-09-19 11:55:03 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/sd.c 2004-10-13 16:29:37 -05:00
@@ -1125,6 +1125,13 @@
* For this reason, we leave the thing in the table.
*/
sdkp->capacity = 0;
+ /*
+ * set a bogus sector size so the normal read/write
+ * logic in the block layer will eventually refuse any
+ * request on this device without tripping over power
+ * of two sector size assumptions
+ */
+ sector_size = 512;
}
{
/*
===== drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 1.16 vs edited =====
--- 1.16/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-06-19 09:45:02 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-10-13 10:38:25 -05:00
@@ -29,10 +29,11 @@
unsigned char *res = kmalloc(66, GFP_KERNEL);
if (res) {
struct block_device *bdev = dev->bd_contains;
- struct buffer_head *bh = __bread(bdev, 0, block_size(bdev));
- if (bh) {
- memcpy(res, bh->b_data + 0x1be, 66);
- brelse(bh);
+ Sector sect;
+ void *data = read_dev_sector(bdev, 0, §);
+ if (data) {
+ memcpy(res, data + 0x1be, 66);
+ put_dev_sector(sect);
} else {
kfree(res);
res = NULL;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size
2004-10-13 21:37 ` James Bottomley
@ 2004-10-13 22:57 ` Brian King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brian King @ 2004-10-13 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: Matthew Wilcox, SCSI Mailing List, dwmw2
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 14:55, Brian King wrote:
>
>>James Bottomley wrote:
>>
>>>How does the attached work for you?
>>
>>Not very well. It looks like it blows up in create_buffers() with this patch.
>>Since the block size (522) is not a multiple of the host page size, we end up
>>decrementing offset to a negative number in create_buffers, which then hits a BUG()
>>in set_bh_page. It looks to me like the block layer assumes the device block size
>>is a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, in more than one place. Here is the latest backtrace:
>
>
> OK it seems that we get to bogus block size confusion before we see the
> device's zero size. The least nasty fix seems to be to set a power of
> two blocksize as well as zeroing the capacity for this problem.
>
> How does the attached fare?
Much better. I no longer get an oops. However, I do get the following confusing
console output since we are lying to the layers above regarding the sector size:
sdl : unsupported sector size 522.
SCSI device sdl: 0 512-byte hdwr sectors (0 MB)
As far as I am concerned, this isn't a showstopper for this patch,
just an observation.
Thanks
-Brian
>
> James
>
> ===== drivers/scsi/sd.c 1.160 vs edited =====
> --- 1.160/drivers/scsi/sd.c 2004-09-19 11:55:03 -05:00
> +++ edited/drivers/scsi/sd.c 2004-10-13 16:29:37 -05:00
> @@ -1125,6 +1125,13 @@
> * For this reason, we leave the thing in the table.
> */
> sdkp->capacity = 0;
> + /*
> + * set a bogus sector size so the normal read/write
> + * logic in the block layer will eventually refuse any
> + * request on this device without tripping over power
> + * of two sector size assumptions
> + */
> + sector_size = 512;
> }
> {
> /*
> ===== drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 1.16 vs edited =====
> --- 1.16/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-06-19 09:45:02 -05:00
> +++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsicam.c 2004-10-13 10:38:25 -05:00
> @@ -29,10 +29,11 @@
> unsigned char *res = kmalloc(66, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (res) {
> struct block_device *bdev = dev->bd_contains;
> - struct buffer_head *bh = __bread(bdev, 0, block_size(bdev));
> - if (bh) {
> - memcpy(res, bh->b_data + 0x1be, 66);
> - brelse(bh);
> + Sector sect;
> + void *data = read_dev_sector(bdev, 0, §);
> + if (data) {
> + memcpy(res, data + 0x1be, 66);
> + put_dev_sector(sect);
> } else {
> kfree(res);
> res = NULL;
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-13 22:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-19 23:02 [PATCH 1/1] scsicam_getgeo_odd_sector_size brking
2004-10-13 14:01 ` Brian King
2004-10-13 14:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-13 14:25 ` Brian King
2004-10-13 15:45 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-13 19:55 ` Brian King
2004-10-13 21:37 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-13 22:57 ` Brian King
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).