From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: [SAS ANNOUNCEMENT] MPT Fusion driver 3.02.07.02 update Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:12:33 -0500 Message-ID: <419A18E1.4070207@adaptec.com> References: <91888D455306F94EBD4D168954A9457C3FFE19@nacos172.co.lsil.com> <41994CED.4080204@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from magic.adaptec.com ([216.52.22.17]:61643 "EHLO magic.adaptec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261999AbUKPPMy (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:12:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <41994CED.4080204@pobox.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: "Moore, Eric Dean" , James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List , Jens Axboe Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Overall, what is needed is 'host control', which can include device > topology manipulation. > Yes, I agree. So would it be wise to conclude that an "extension" to the LLDD methods would be needed. I think this is what SDI would end up being. Host/Bus/target/lun woulnd't merely be enough, albeit only in the core of the OS. HBTL translation is one of the points SDI addresses. Luben