Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
> 
>> James:
>>
>> This is an updated and unmangled version of the patch sent in by 
>> Martin Peschke.  Apparently some drives report Hardware Error sense 
>> for problems which do improve after retrying, so the patch retries 
>> these supposedly "unrecoverable" errors for such devices.
> 
> 
> Recent SPC-3 and SBC-2 drafts treat the sense keys of
> MEDIUM ERROR and HARDWARE ERROR in a similar way.
> Both can return an "info" field which has the same
> meaning (lba of first failure). The distinction is that
> MEDIUM ERROR is a little more precise (at least for
> magnetic rotating media) **. For flash ram the distinction
> is moot.
> 
> I believe MEDIUM ERROR and HARDWARE ERROR should be
> treated the same way in scsi_check_sense() (i.e.
> both return NEEDS_RETRY). That way an extra black list
> category is avoided.
> 
> 
> ** HARDWARE ERROR is returned in cases of self diagnostic
> failure and lack of available blocks for reassignment.
> It seems valid for a device to return a HARDWARE ERROR
> sense key both for these cases and unrecoverable data
> errors (and ignore MEDIUM ERROR).

... after a bit further thought, a retry (arguably) is only
needed when an unrecoverable (data) error is detected. If we
assume the "info" field indicates an unrecoverable error
then the following patch combines the processing of
MEDIUM and HARDWARE ERROR sense keys without the need for
a black list category.

Doug Gilbert