From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adaptec SAS/SATA device driver [03/27] Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:03:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4214EA6E.8020608@pobox.com> References: <4214D5E8.9000907@adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:20398 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262309AbVBQTDb (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:03:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4214D5E8.9000907@adaptec.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Luben Tuikov Cc: SCSI Mailing List , James Bottomley Luben, Your emails do not comply with the Linux kernel patch submission format. Please read http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html Most critical is rule number #5 (signed-off-by line), but also important is rule number #1 (providing a useful subject line). NOTE: I am _not_ requesting that you resubmit your 27 patches; that's up to James. Just making a note for the future. Everyone who submits patches to Linux needs to include a signed-off-by line, and format their emails such that automated scripts will process the emails correctly. Jeff