From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adaptec SAS/SATA device driver [03/27]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:09:06 -0500
Message-ID: <4214EBD2.3050409@adaptec.com>
References: <4214D5E8.9000907@adaptec.com> <4214EA6E.8020608@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from magic.adaptec.com ([216.52.22.17]:63429 "EHLO magic.adaptec.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262352AbVBQTJL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:09:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4214EA6E.8020608@pobox.com>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>

On 02/17/05 14:03, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Luben,
> 
> Your emails do not comply with the Linux kernel patch submission format. 
>   Please read
>     http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
> 
> Most critical is rule number #5 (signed-off-by line), but also important 
> is rule number #1 (providing a useful subject line).

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for you reply.  I'm well aware of the patch format.
I wasn't sure about a different subject line since it it all part
of a driver posting, "announce" rathern than "patch".

Yes, I forgot to add a signed off line.  Sorry, but then again
I didn't write the code, just presenting it. (#5. Sign your work...)

Also this is more an announcement rather than a patch, but yes,
recent sd patch I submitted I think I followed the rules.

Thanks for reminding me of the rules,
	Luben