From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adaptec SAS/SATA device driver [03/27]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:22:15 -0500
Message-ID: <4214EEE7.4060300@adaptec.com>
References: <4214D5E8.9000907@adaptec.com> <4214EA6E.8020608@pobox.com> <4214EBD2.3050409@adaptec.com> <4214EDE0.3020006@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from magic.adaptec.com ([216.52.22.17]:18126 "EHLO magic.adaptec.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261158AbVBQTW0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:22:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4214EDE0.3020006@pobox.com>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>

On 02/17/05 14:17, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> A key point is that it is impossible to differentiate your 27 patches, 
> from looking at them in a email summary.  Putting a short summary of 
> each patch in the email subject line greatly assists those reviewing 
> your code.

Ok, that makes sense.  I wish I had added that to the subject lines.
 
> "sign your work" is more of a legal sign-off than a notation of 
> authorship.  In some cases, a company lawyer may be the person included 
> in the signed-off-by line.

Ok, I see.  I guess I was a bit shy on that.
Feel free to add "Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>",
to each patch.

Thanks Jeff!
	Luben