From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tokarev Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adaptec SAS/SATA device driver [03/27] Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:39:21 +0300 Message-ID: <42150F09.6020309@tls.msk.ru> References: <4214D5E8.9000907@adaptec.com> <4214EA6E.8020608@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from hobbit.corpit.ru ([81.13.94.6]:3162 "EHLO hobbit.corpit.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261199AbVBQVj0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:39:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4214EA6E.8020608@pobox.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: SCSI Mailing List Jeff Garzik wrote: > Luben, [] > Everyone who submits patches to Linux needs to include a signed-off-by > line, and format their emails such that automated scripts will process > the emails correctly. BTW, as this is a completely new driver (for the kernel source anyway), and there's no "patch" per se here in usual sense (but alot of closely related new files), I think it'll be better to submit it as a tarball, not a series of "patches", most of which are with useless comments (given after the filename the path introduces)... Tarball and a patch for usual places like Kconfig and Makefiles in the upper-level in the source tree... Just IMHO ofcourse. /mjt