From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Yum Rayan <yum.rayan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, dgilbert@interlog.com,
james.bottomley@steeleye.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in sg.c
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:56:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4240E8D5.4080602@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df35dfeb05032200034d3ab10c@mail.gmail.com>
Yum Rayan wrote:
> Attempt to reduce stack usage in sg.c.
>
> Used checkstack.pl script to measure stack usage and noted follows:
>
> Before patch:
> sg_ioctl - 412
> sg_read - 200
>
> After patch:
> sg_ioctl - 92
> sg_read - 96
>
> Thanks,
> Rayan
>
> Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <yum.rayan@gmail.com>
Mostly looks OK to me. However, I would rather see patches
against the current -bk instead of 2.6.x.y.
This one does not apply to 2.6.12-rc1-bk1.
AFAIK, development is still primarily done against the linus-bk
tree and not the x.y release tree.
Hunk #1 FAILED at 335.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 971 with fuzz 2 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 997 (offset -6 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/scsi/sg.c.rej
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.11.5.orig/drivers/scsi/sg.c linux-2.6.11.5/drivers/scsi/sg.c
> --- linux-2.6.11.5.orig/drivers/scsi/sg.c 2005-03-18 22:34:56.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.11.5/drivers/scsi/sg.c 2005-03-21 23:48:52.000000000 -0800
> @@ -335,109 +335,143 @@
> Sg_fd *sfp;
> Sg_request *srp;
> int req_pack_id = -1;
> - struct sg_header old_hdr;
> - sg_io_hdr_t new_hdr;
> + struct sg_header *old_hdr;
> sg_io_hdr_t *hp;
> + int retval = 0;
> +
>
> if ((!(sfp = (Sg_fd *) filp->private_data)) || (!(sdp = sfp->parentdp)))
> return -ENXIO;
> SCSI_LOG_TIMEOUT(3, printk("sg_read: %s, count=%d\n",
> sdp->disk->disk_name, (int) count));
> - if ((k = verify_area(VERIFY_WRITE, buf, count)))
> - return k;
> + old_hdr = kmalloc(SZ_SG_HEADER, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!old_hdr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + if ((k = verify_area(VERIFY_WRITE, buf, count))) {
> + retval = k;
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> + }
> if (sfp->force_packid && (count >= SZ_SG_HEADER)) {
> - if (__copy_from_user(&old_hdr, buf, SZ_SG_HEADER))
> - return -EFAULT;
> - if (old_hdr.reply_len < 0) {
> + if (__copy_from_user(old_hdr, buf, SZ_SG_HEADER)){
> + retval = -EFAULT;
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> + }
> + if (old_hdr->reply_len < 0) {
> if (count >= SZ_SG_IO_HDR) {
> - if (__copy_from_user
> - (&new_hdr, buf, SZ_SG_IO_HDR))
> - return -EFAULT;
> - req_pack_id = new_hdr.pack_id;
> + sg_io_hdr_t *new_hdr;
> + new_hdr = kmalloc(SZ_SG_IO_HDR, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new_hdr) {
> + retval = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> + }
> + retval = __copy_from_user(new_hdr, buf,
> + SZ_SG_IO_HDR);
> + req_pack_id = new_hdr->pack_id;
> + kfree(new_hdr);
> + if (retval) {
> + retval = -EFAULT;
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> + }
> }
> } else
> - req_pack_id = old_hdr.pack_id;
> + req_pack_id = old_hdr->pack_id;
> }
> srp = sg_get_rq_mark(sfp, req_pack_id);
> if (!srp) { /* now wait on packet to arrive */
> - if (sdp->detached)
> - return -ENODEV;
> - if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> - return -EAGAIN;
> + if (sdp->detached) {
> + retval = -ENODEV;
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> + }
> + if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> + retval = -EAGAIN;
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> + }
This patch section looks suspect to me:
Notice that the second '+' sign begins an illegal construct,
probably missing an 'if' line or 2.
Or the '+' should be '-'.
> while (1) {
> - res = 0; /* following is a macro that beats race condition */
> + res = 0; /* following macro beats race condition */
> __wait_event_interruptible(sfp->read_wait,
> - (sdp->detached || (srp = sg_get_rq_mark(sfp, req_pack_id))),
> - res);
> - if (sdp->detached)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + (sdp->detached ||
> + (srp = sg_get_rq_mark(sfp, req_pack_id))),
> + res);
> + if (sdp->detached) {
> + retval = -ENODEV;
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> + }
> if (0 == res)
> break;
> - return res; /* -ERESTARTSYS because signal hit process */
> + retval = res; /* -ERESTARTSYS as signal hit process */
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> }
> }
> - if (srp->header.interface_id != '\0')
> - return sg_new_read(sfp, buf, count, srp);
> + if (srp->header.interface_id != '\0') {
> + retval = sg_new_read(sfp, buf, count, srp);
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> + }
>
> hp = &srp->header;
> - memset(&old_hdr, 0, SZ_SG_HEADER);
> - old_hdr.reply_len = (int) hp->timeout;
> - old_hdr.pack_len = old_hdr.reply_len; /* very old, strange behaviour */
> - old_hdr.pack_id = hp->pack_id;
> - old_hdr.twelve_byte =
> + memset(old_hdr, 0, SZ_SG_HEADER);
> + old_hdr->reply_len = (int) hp->timeout;
> + old_hdr->pack_len = old_hdr->reply_len; /* old, strange behaviour */
> + old_hdr->pack_id = hp->pack_id;
> + old_hdr->twelve_byte =
> ((srp->data.cmd_opcode >= 0xc0) && (12 == hp->cmd_len)) ? 1 : 0;
> - old_hdr.target_status = hp->masked_status;
> - old_hdr.host_status = hp->host_status;
> - old_hdr.driver_status = hp->driver_status;
> + old_hdr->target_status = hp->masked_status;
> + old_hdr->host_status = hp->host_status;
> + old_hdr->driver_status = hp->driver_status;
> if ((CHECK_CONDITION & hp->masked_status) ||
> (DRIVER_SENSE & hp->driver_status))
> - memcpy(old_hdr.sense_buffer, srp->sense_b,
> - sizeof (old_hdr.sense_buffer));
> + memcpy(old_hdr->sense_buffer, srp->sense_b,
> + sizeof (old_hdr->sense_buffer));
> switch (hp->host_status) {
> /* This setup of 'result' is for backward compatibility and is best
> ignored by the user who should use target, host + driver status */
> case DID_OK:
> case DID_PASSTHROUGH:
> case DID_SOFT_ERROR:
> - old_hdr.result = 0;
> + old_hdr->result = 0;
> break;
> case DID_NO_CONNECT:
> case DID_BUS_BUSY:
> case DID_TIME_OUT:
> - old_hdr.result = EBUSY;
> + old_hdr->result = EBUSY;
> break;
> case DID_BAD_TARGET:
> case DID_ABORT:
> case DID_PARITY:
> case DID_RESET:
> case DID_BAD_INTR:
> - old_hdr.result = EIO;
> + old_hdr->result = EIO;
> break;
> case DID_ERROR:
> - old_hdr.result = (srp->sense_b[0] == 0 &&
> + old_hdr->result = (srp->sense_b[0] == 0 &&
> hp->masked_status == GOOD) ? 0 : EIO;
> break;
> default:
> - old_hdr.result = EIO;
> + old_hdr->result = EIO;
> break;
> }
>
> /* Now copy the result back to the user buffer. */
> if (count >= SZ_SG_HEADER) {
> - if (__copy_to_user(buf, &old_hdr, SZ_SG_HEADER))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + if (__copy_to_user(buf, old_hdr, SZ_SG_HEADER)) {
> + retval = -EFAULT;
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> + }
> buf += SZ_SG_HEADER;
> - if (count > old_hdr.reply_len)
> - count = old_hdr.reply_len;
> + if (count > old_hdr->reply_len)
> + count = old_hdr->reply_len;
> if (count > SZ_SG_HEADER) {
> if ((res =
> sg_read_oxfer(srp, buf, count - SZ_SG_HEADER)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + retval = -EFAULT;
> + goto free_old_hdr;
> }
> } else
> - count = (old_hdr.result == 0) ? 0 : -EIO;
> + count = (old_hdr->result == 0) ? 0 : -EIO;
> sg_finish_rem_req(srp);
> - return count;
> + retval = count;
> +free_old_hdr:
> + kfree(old_hdr);
> + return retval;
> }
>
> static ssize_t
> @@ -943,8 +977,11 @@
> if (result)
> return result;
> else {
> - sg_req_info_t rinfo[SG_MAX_QUEUE];
> - Sg_request *srp;
> + sg_req_info_t *rinfo;
> + rinfo = kmalloc(SG_MAX_QUEUE * SZ_SG_REQ_INFO,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rinfo)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> read_lock_irqsave(&sfp->rq_list_lock, iflags);
> for (srp = sfp->headrp, val = 0; val < SG_MAX_QUEUE;
> ++val, srp = srp ? srp->nextrp : srp) {
> @@ -966,8 +1003,11 @@
> }
> }
> read_unlock_irqrestore(&sfp->rq_list_lock, iflags);
> - return (__copy_to_user(p, rinfo,
> - SZ_SG_REQ_INFO * SG_MAX_QUEUE) ? -EFAULT : 0);
> + result = __copy_to_user(p, rinfo, SZ_SG_REQ_INFO *
> + SG_MAX_QUEUE);
> + result = result ? -EFAULT : 0;
> + kfree(rinfo);
> + return result;
> }
> case SG_EMULATED_HOST:
> if (sdp->detached)
> -
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-23 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-22 8:03 [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in sg.c Yum Rayan
2005-03-23 3:56 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-03-25 8:20 ` Yum Rayan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4240E8D5.4080602@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yum.rayan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox