From: Markus Lidel <Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com>
To: "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ross Macintyre <raz@macs.hw.ac.uk>,
Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
matt_domsch@dell.com
Subject: Re: adaptec 2120S software under RedHat 8.0 and FC2
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:43:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4241AAC3.7050702@shadowconnect.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60807403EABEB443939A5A7AA8A7458BED3211@otce2k01.adaptec.com>
Hello,
Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> [...]
>>note that if adaptec simply opensourced their managment tools we wouldn't
>>have this problem at all. I wonder why Adaptec did that for the old
>>i2o-based controllers but not aacraid.
> Oh yes, that, worked hard on the powers-that-be to permit this. Could
> not release a substantial majority of it because it would violate
> licensed libraries (Zinc, being one of them, I am sorry to admit). So we
> release the engine and the raidutil. No logger, no remote communication
> engine, no GUI and no browser engine either. It was the best we could
> do.
> Once released, and under a BSD license, the open source community failed
> to contribute one change to the sources. All it did was permit the tools
> to be packaged, archived and to continue in-perpetuity when
> compatibility libraries failed to work on newer installations.
Hmmm, IMHO that's not 100% correct... It's true that currently there is
no new version. I'm working on the 64-bit version and a rewrite of the
kernel-interface to get rid of the ioctl's... Because i'm still working
on the interface, i haven't released both the kernel as well as the
raidutils yet. But you could look into subversion to see that there *is*
developement. Also IMHO it is be better to provide documentation for how
to program the controller instead of releasing the source of the
management tool itself.
> [...]
Best regards,
Markus Lidel
------------------------------------------
Markus Lidel (Senior IT Consultant)
Shadow Connect GmbH
Carl-Reisch-Weg 12
D-86381 Krumbach
Germany
Phone: +49 82 82/99 51-0
Fax: +49 82 82/99 51-11
E-Mail: Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com
URL: http://www.shadowconnect.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-23 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 15:37 adaptec 2120S software under RedHat 8.0 and FC2 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-03-23 17:43 ` Markus Lidel [this message]
2005-03-28 21:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-22 17:43 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-03-23 11:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-17 13:41 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-03-20 9:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-22 16:32 ` Ross Macintyre
2005-03-23 11:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-23 17:53 ` Markus Lidel
2005-03-24 17:19 ` Ross Macintyre
2005-03-16 13:02 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-03-16 21:52 ` Mark Haverkamp
2005-03-20 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-16 11:20 Ross Macintyre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4241AAC3.7050702@shadowconnect.com \
--to=markus.lidel@shadowconnect.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
--cc=markh@osdl.org \
--cc=matt_domsch@dell.com \
--cc=raz@macs.hw.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox