From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: Symbios PCI error recovery [Was: Re: [PATCH/RFC] ppc64: EEH + SCSI recovery (IPR only)]
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:27:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <424D685A.6070505@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050401060834.GB29734@colo.lackof.org>
Grant Grundler wrote:
>>>You want everything moved back to the "queued" state or failed
>>>(flush pending IO so upper layers can retry if they want).
>>
>>Upper layer is the linux block device; my understanding is that it does
>>not retry, nor do the filesystems above that. Passing errors upwards
>>seems to be pretty darned fatal. My goal is to limit retries to the
>>driver.
>
>
> That's a bad idea. Been there done that.
>
> Upper layers can be alot smarter about retries than the driver ever
> could be. While the driver knows more about the transport and why
> someting might fail, upper layers will know alternate pathes
> to the same devices or to the same data on different devices.
> Upper layers also set the recovery policy for particular storage.
>
> Trying to do recovery transperently in the drivers is going to also
> mess up other high level SW like Service Guard or LifeKeeper.
> They want to know when a path has failed, log it, and make sure
> someone gets sent to service the HW if threshholds are exceeded.
>
> Let higher layers like dm, VxFS, LVM worry about recovery.
The sym2 driver should fail everything back with DID_ERROR.
In most cases, the scsi midlayer will retry if the upper layer allows
retries and you will get the behavior you desire. If retries are not
allowed, like for a tape device, the command will get failed back to the
upper layer driver.
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-01 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050223002409.GA10909@austin.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20050223174356.GH13081@kroah.com>
[not found] ` <1109207532.5384.32.camel@gaston>
[not found] ` <20050224013137.GF2088@austin.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20050226063609.GC7036@colo.lackof.org>
2005-03-21 23:10 ` Symbios PCI error recovery [Was: Re: [PATCH/RFC] ppc64: EEH + SCSI recovery (IPR only)] Linas Vepstas
2005-03-22 17:38 ` Brian King
2005-03-31 20:14 ` Linas Vepstas
2005-04-01 6:15 ` Grant Grundler
2005-03-22 17:57 ` Grant Grundler
2005-03-31 20:06 ` Linas Vepstas
2005-04-01 6:08 ` Grant Grundler
2005-04-01 15:27 ` Brian King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=424D685A.6070505@us.ibm.com \
--to=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox