From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, dmitry_yus@yahoo.com,
Sander <sander@humilis.net>,
David Hollis <dhollis@davehollis.com>,
Maciej Soltysiak <solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: several messages
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:17:44 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42832D48.2080204@vlnb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0505112309430.8122@poirot.grange>
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hello and thanks for the replies
>
> On Wed, 11 May 2005, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
>>The iSCSI protocol simply encapsulates the SCSI protocol into the
>>TCP/IP protocol, and carries packets over IP networks. You can handle
>
> ...
>
> On Wed, 11 May 2005, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>
>>Actually, this is property not of iSCSI target itself, but of any SCSI target.
>>So, we implemented it as part of our SCSI target mid-level (SCST,
>>http://scst.sourceforge.net), therefore any target driver working over it will
>>automatically benefit from this feature. Unfortunately, currently available
>>only target drivers for Qlogic 2x00 cards and for poor UNH iSCSI target (that
>>works not too reliable and only with very specific initiators). The published
>
> ...
>
> The above confirms basically my understanding apart from one "minor"
> confusion - I thought, that parallel to hardware solutions pure software
> implementations were possible / being developed, like a driver, that
> implements a SCSI LDD API on one side, and forwards packets to an IP
> stack, say, over an ethernet card - on the initiator side. And a counter
> part on the target side. Similarly to the USB mass-storage and storage
> gadget drivers?
There is some confusion in the SCSI world between SCSI as a transport
and SCSI as a commands set and software communication protocol, which
works above the transport. So, you can implement SCSI transport at any
software (eg iSCSI) or hardware (parallel SCSI, Fibre Channel, SATA,
etc.) way, but if the SCSI message passing protocol is used overall
system remains SCSI with all protocol obligations like task management.
So, pure software SCSI solution is possible. BTW, there are pure
hardware iSCSI implementations as well.
Vlad
> Thanks
> Guennadi
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-12 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1416215015.20050504193114@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
[not found] ` <1115236116.7761.19.camel@dhollis-lnx.sunera.com>
[not found] ` <1104082357.20050504231722@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
[not found] ` <1115305794.3071.5.camel@dhollis-lnx.sunera.com>
[not found] ` <20050507150538.GA800@favonius>
2005-05-10 22:00 ` Re[2]: ata over ethernet question Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-10 23:14 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-11 5:42 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " FUJITA Tomonori
2005-05-11 8:56 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-05-11 21:26 ` several messages Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-12 2:16 ` Ming Zhang
2005-05-12 18:32 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 15:04 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 15:38 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-12 10:17 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin [this message]
2005-05-12 19:42 ` SCSI/ISCSI, hardware/software Bryan Henderson
2005-05-13 4:55 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-05-13 10:34 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-05-13 23:58 ` Bryan Henderson
2005-05-12 18:52 ` Re[2]: ata over ethernet question James Bottomley
2005-05-12 19:05 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-12 19:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-12 19:44 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 16:18 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 18:50 ` iSCSI vs. NBD (was Re: ata over ethernet question) Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-13 20:21 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-13 22:49 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-25 23:41 ` NBD (vs. iSCSI vs. EATA vs...) Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-26 1:19 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-26 17:48 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42832D48.2080204@vlnb.net \
--to=vst@vlnb.net \
--cc=dhollis@davehollis.com \
--cc=dmitry_yus@yahoo.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sander@humilis.net \
--cc=solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox