From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kumba Subject: Re: sd driver Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 20:49:57 -0400 Message-ID: <42927A35.6060207@gentoo.org> References: <4291F929.2010409@netstorage.it> <1116864085.6280.35.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35]:22472 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261267AbVEXArU (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2005 20:47:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1116864085.6280.35.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > ignoring the previous answer and posting your question three times isn't > going to get your question answered faster. > Just out of mild curiosity, when one composes a question after much research, and posts it to a mailing list, but gets no response after...almost 2-3 weeks, is it considered impolite to re-post or otherwise "bump" the question again? :) --Kumba -- "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond