From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix reference counting for failed SCSI devices
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 08:50:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4294201D.4070304@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1116975478.7710.28.camel@mulgrave>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2168 bytes --]
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 11:38 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>whenever the scsi-ml tries to scan non-existent devices the reference
>>count in scsi_alloc_sdev() and scsi_probe_and_add_lun() is not adjusted
>>properly. Every call to XXX_initialize in the driver core sets the
>>reference count to 1, so for a proper deallocation an explicit XXX_put()
>>has to be done.
>
> That's true, but I don't see what the problem is if the device has never
> been made visible.
>
It's not visible but it's still allocated and referenced. So on doing a
rmmod these class_devices are being deallocated which crashes as the
class device is not connected properly.
>>+ put_device(&starget->dev);
>
> this would amount to a double put, since the parent put method is called
> in the device release.
>
Oops. Correct.
>>+ class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
>
> This is unnecessary since the class device is simply occupying a private
> area in the scsi_device. As long as its never made visible to the
> system, its refcount is irrelevant
>
It's not. Whenever you try to rmmod the adapter it becomes highly
relevant. If it doesn't crash you've at least generated a memleak as the
class device is never freed.
(And these are quite a few for Wide-SCSI Double-channel adapters ...)
>> put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
>> out:
>> if (display_failure_msg)
>>@@ -855,6 +857,8 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
>> if (sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy)
>> sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy(sdev);
>> transport_destroy_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
>>+ class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
>>+ put_device(sdev->sdev_gendev.parent);
>
> same should apply here. As long as this cascade occurs before
> scsi_add_lun() (which calls scsi_sysfs_add_sdev()), which is what makes
> the whole set of devices and classes visible.
>
Correct for the parent device. The class device has to be deallocated
properly if a rmmod should work properly.
New patch attached. Please apply.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke hare@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG S390 & zSeries
Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053 688
90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de
[-- Attachment #2: linux-2.6.12-rc4-scsi-scan-fix-refcount-on-fail --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1047 bytes --]
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Fix refcount for failed devices
When a non-present device is scanned it is not properly deregistered
from the driver core. Calling XXX_initialize() functions from the driver
core sets the reference count to 1, so for proper deallocation a
XXX_put() has to be issued.
--- linux-2.6.12-rc4/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c.orig 2005-05-24 10:26:46.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc4/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c 2005-05-24 10:55:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static struct scsi_device *scsi_alloc_sd
out_device_destroy:
transport_destroy_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
scsi_free_queue(sdev->request_queue);
+ class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
out:
if (display_failure_msg)
@@ -855,6 +856,7 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
if (sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy)
sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy(sdev);
transport_destroy_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
+ class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
}
out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-25 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-24 9:38 [PATCH] Fix reference counting for failed SCSI devices Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-24 22:57 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 6:50 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2005-05-25 12:27 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 12:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 14:58 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 15:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 17:51 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 18:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4294201D.4070304@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox