From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "K.R. Foley" Subject: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ? Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 05:37:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4295A6FC.9000509@cybsft.com> References: <20050516085832.GA9558@gmail.com> <20050517071307.GA4794@in.ibm.com> <20050517002908.005a9ba7.akpm@osdl.org> <20050517083436.GB4794@in.ibm.com> <20050526003930.71bb14fb.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from relay02.pair.com ([209.68.5.16]:51474 "HELO relay02.pair.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261279AbVEZKhu (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2005 06:37:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050526003930.71bb14fb.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: dino@in.ibm.com, gregoire.favre@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Dinakar Guniguntala wrote: > >>On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:29:08AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>>Better cc linux-scsi. >> >> Thanks >> >> >>>Are these bugs also present in 2.6.12-rc4? >> >>Yes, I tried a vanilla 2.6.12-rc4 and I get the same output. >>I get this from 2.6.12-rc3 onwards. > > > Gents, can you please confirm that 2.6.12-rc5 is working OK now? > Andrew, I know this wasn't directed at me, but I can confirm that the problems I was having with my aic7899, that James and I resolved under this thread, are in fact gone in 2.6.12-rc5. Booted it last night. :-) -- kr