From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH] use spi_transport_class for aic79xx Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:27:00 +0200 Message-ID: <42A843A4.2080702@suse.de> References: <42A7EAEA.3060302@suse.de> <42A7F5A7.5080401@pobox.com> <42A7FD7A.1050105@suse.de> <1118322702.5041.2.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:7078 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262374AbVFIN1D (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:27:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1118322702.5041.2.camel@mulgrave> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Jeff Garzik , SCSI Mailing List James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:27 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >>Next step is to connect an U320 drive to check it works properly. >=20 > That's definitely a requirement. The sole function of aic79xx over > aic7xxx is u320. That being said, I have been covertly converting th= e > transport classes to cope with u320 DV. I believe now it all works. > However, you need to plug in more transport parameters than you > currently have (even if a lot of them are read only). You also need = to > update the couplings for the period =3D=3D 8 case (which is u32). A-ha. Can't say I understood all of it, but nevertheless. >=20 > Let me post the patches I used to fusion as an RFC and you can examin= e > the variable setting routines to see how it's done=20 >=20 That would be helpful. Is it in your recent scsi-misc patch? Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke hare@suse.de SuSE Linux AG S390 & zSeries Maxfeldstra=C3=9Fe 5 +49 911 74053 688 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg http://www.suse.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html