From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yiannis Mavroukakis Subject: Re: legacy megaraid driver bug in mm-series Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 08:56:25 +0100 Message-ID: <431FEEA9.60407@darthvader.us> References: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E5703662B18@exa-atlanta> <20050907133355.54f3dd2d.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail56.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.67]:63960 "HELO mail56.messagelabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751335AbVIHH4J (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2005 03:56:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050907133355.54f3dd2d.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: >"Ju, Seokmann" wrote: > > >>Hi Andrew, >>On Wednesday, September 07, 2005 5:53 AM, Andrew Morton forwarded: >> >> >>>2.6.11-mm1: works >>>2.6.11-mm4: works >>>2.6.12-rc5-mm1: will not compile >>>2.6.12-rc6-mm1: works >>>2.6.12-mm1: will not compile megaraid driver >>>2.6.12-mm2: broken >>>2.6.13-mm1: broken >>> >>>2.6.12: works >>>2.6.13: works >>> >>> >>Is there any precedence rule on the kernels?. >> >> >> > >It's a bit weird, but the above are in chronological order. > >Time order: > > 2.6.12 > 2.6.13-rc1 > 2.6.13-rc2 > 2.6.13 > 2.6.14-rc1 > >etc. And -mm kernels are just the current Linus kernel with -mmX appended. > > > >>I wonder which kernel is latest in between 2.6.12 and 2.6.12-mmx. >> >> > >2.6.12-mmX > > > >>I assume 2.6.12-mmx is later than 2.6.12. >> >> > >Correct. > > > 2.6.13-mm1 doesn't work on my megaraid controller. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________