From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13 14/14] sas-class: SCSI Host glue Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:46:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4325CD1F.2090501@adaptec.com> References: <20050910041218.29183.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com> <1126357713.3222.149.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <432588E4.5020103@adaptec.com> <20050912141357.GA28933@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050912141357.GA28933@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= Cc: Arjan van de Ven , luben_tuikov@adaptec.com, SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , James Bottomley List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 09/12/05 10:13, J=F6rn Engel wrote: > On Mon, 12 September 2005 09:55:48 -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote: >=20 >>No, I do not. I'm _not_ a maintainer. I'm simply a _contributor_. >=20 >=20 > Putting in less effort than someone else is hardly an excuse for > anything. Much less for personal attacks. >=20 > Can you please cut it off and offer technical arguments? Even if the > maintainer had a personal problem with you, technical arguments tend > to win and good code will go in. Everything else is just mailing lis= t > noise and increased hart rates for some people. =46or technical arguments, please read the linux-scsi mailing list sinc= e 2000. Thanks, Luben