From: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:03:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4339CFC7.6080507@adaptec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4339C12C.5020004@pobox.com>
On 09/27/05 18:01, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Luben Tuikov wrote:
>
>>The driver and the infrastructure needs to go in.
>>
>>Give it exposure to the people, let people play with it.
>
>
> Merging into the upstream kernel is not necessary for exposure.
>
> Historically, saying "no" to a single vendor pushing really hard -- as
> you are doing -- has resulted in a superior solution.
This of course implies that everything in Linux is a
superiour solution _or_ if it is not, then everything in
linux is a vendor solution.
>>If we start "fixing" SCSI Core now (this in itself is JB red
>>herring), how long before it is "fixed" and we can "rest"?
>>And how long then before the driver and infrastructure
>>makes it in?
>
> Just follow the recipe Christoph outlined. It's not difficult, just
> requires some work.
Anyone have a clear technical plan and/or infrastructure
on how to do this? Any specs, plans, consolidations, etc?
I know its a wishful thinking, but when the architectures
differ, not sure how to do this.
"You can do everything with a big long if ()".
> So far, this is an Adaptec-only solution.
Yes, since Adaptec is the first company to come out with
open transport SAS chip. Broadcom seems to be doing the same thing.
> It does an end run around 90% of the SCSI core. You might as well make
> it a block driver, if you're going to do that.
The "90%" part isn't quite true.
But going with a block device isn't that bad:
Now since the architecture _is_ SCSI after all, what would be
needed is a minimal, fast, straightforward, SAM/SPC fully complient
new SCSI Core. That SCSI Core would register block devices
with the block layer. Maybe Jens can point out cool things
to do and make the whole infrastructure fast and very fast.
(since we don't need to be bound by this legacy stuff)
Essentially other new technology LLDD and Transport layers
can probably make use of this: Infiniband, USB2 Storage, etc.
So if all you have is an AIC-94xx or BCM8603 storage chip
you can exclule all of the legacy SCSI Core and compile this
new mean, lean, fast SAM Core.
Jeff, this isn't bad at all!
Are you willing to contribute to such an effort?
Thanks,
Luben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-27 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 162+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-27 13:07 I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel Luben Tuikov
2005-09-27 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-27 15:01 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-27 15:53 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-27 19:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-27 20:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-27 21:44 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-27 22:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-27 23:03 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2005-09-27 23:32 ` Andrew Patterson
2005-09-28 2:07 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] <43384E28.8030207@adaptec.com>
2005-09-27 21:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-27 22:51 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-27 23:14 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-09-28 11:37 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-28 12:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-09-28 14:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-28 16:27 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-28 16:34 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-28 19:45 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-09-28 20:56 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-28 22:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-28 23:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-28 23:29 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-29 5:30 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-09-29 7:24 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-30 7:36 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-09-30 18:34 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 18:50 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-30 19:08 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 21:31 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-30 22:10 ` Greg Freemyer
2005-09-30 22:19 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 23:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-01 4:58 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-10-03 15:08 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-03 14:04 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 22:14 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-01 0:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-03 14:18 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-03 16:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-30 20:45 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-30 22:05 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-01 0:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-03 15:27 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-03 16:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-30 22:04 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-09-30 22:32 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 23:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-03 14:15 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-03 15:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-03 16:23 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-03 16:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-03 19:03 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-03 19:32 ` Mike Christie
2005-10-03 20:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-03 19:10 ` Mike Christie
2005-09-30 18:51 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 14:33 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 14:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 15:50 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 16:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 18:25 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 15:15 ` grundig
2005-09-29 15:17 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-09-29 16:33 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 16:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 16:58 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 17:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 18:09 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2005-09-29 17:13 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-09-29 18:39 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 22:43 ` Joel Becker
2005-09-29 17:52 ` John Stoffel
2005-09-29 19:20 ` Bruce Ferrell
2005-09-28 22:43 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-09-29 15:04 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 15:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 16:22 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 19:09 ` Stefan Richter
2005-09-29 22:06 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-28 16:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-28 16:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-28 2:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-28 20:36 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-28 21:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-28 22:10 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-28 23:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 4:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-29 7:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-09-29 15:09 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 15:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 16:56 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 17:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-30 18:16 ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-29 17:15 ` Stefan Richter
2005-09-29 17:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 19:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-29 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-29 23:20 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 23:57 ` Prasenjit Sarkar
2005-09-30 6:35 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-09-30 0:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 1:25 ` Hua Zhong
2005-09-30 2:42 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-09-30 19:12 ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-30 7:29 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-09-30 14:23 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 16:26 ` Andrew Patterson
2005-09-30 16:47 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 14:07 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 5:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-09-30 6:52 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-09-29 19:59 ` Stefan Richter
2005-09-29 19:37 ` Stefan Richter
2005-09-29 19:22 ` Stefan Richter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-28 0:28 Moore, Eric Dean
2005-09-28 1:34 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-09-28 11:42 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-28 15:15 Moore, Eric Dean
2005-09-28 16:59 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-28 22:17 Moore, Eric Dean
2005-09-29 12:46 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-29 15:45 Moore, Eric Dean
2005-09-30 1:28 Martin Fouts
2005-09-30 17:07 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-09-30 17:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-01 23:55 ` Alan Cox
2005-10-03 16:17 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-04 6:51 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-10-04 15:01 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 18:39 ` Andrew Patterson
2005-09-30 19:21 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 20:14 ` Andrew Patterson
2005-09-30 20:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-09-30 21:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-01 17:46 ` Greg KH
2005-09-30 20:32 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 21:15 ` Andrew Patterson
2005-09-30 21:40 ` Joel Becker
2005-09-30 22:01 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-30 23:42 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-10-03 13:54 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-03 16:29 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-10-03 16:35 ` Andrew Patterson
2005-10-03 16:39 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-03 19:16 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-10-03 21:26 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-10-03 22:04 ` Ryan Anderson
2005-10-03 22:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-03 23:22 ` Al Viro
2005-10-04 13:55 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-10-04 15:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-04 14:38 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-04 14:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-04 15:19 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-04 15:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-04 15:40 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-04 15:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-10-04 6:30 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-10-01 0:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-01 0:01 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4339CFC7.6080507@adaptec.com \
--to=luben_tuikov@adaptec.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).