From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:16:47 -0400 Message-ID: <43584F8F.4070403@pobox.com> References: <91888D455306F94EBD4D168954A9457C048F0E34@nacos172.co.lsil.com> <4358497E.6070107@torque.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:37297 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964843AbVJUCRA (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:17:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4358497E.6070107@torque.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: dougg@torque.net Cc: "Moore, Eric Dean" , Luben Tuikov , Christoph Hellwig , jejb@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Douglas Gilbert wrote: > Just a suggestion if you want to bring /dev/sg into > the picture for a SMP (and even a STP) passthrough. Yep. That's another possibility, that falls into the 'block driver' category [see list of categories in my 'ioctl' email], since it is translated into a 'special' block request, and then sent to a normal request_queue. Jens Axboe's bsg[1] has also been mentioned in the context of SMP. Jeff [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/96547/