From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:22:09 -0400 Message-ID: <43593FE1.7020506@adaptec.com> References: <91888D455306F94EBD4D168954A9457C048F0E34@nacos172.co.lsil.com> <20051020160155.GA14296@lst.de> <4357CB03.4020400@adaptec.com> <20051020170330.GA16458@lst.de> <4357F7DE.7050004@adaptec.com> <1129852879.30258.137.camel@bluto.andrew> <43583A53.2090904@pobox.com> <435929FD.4070304@adaptec.com> <43593100.5040708@pobox.com> <43593884.7000800@adaptec.com> <4359395B.9030402@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4359395B.9030402@pobox.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: andrew.patterson@hp.com, Christoph Hellwig , "Moore, Eric Dean" , jejb@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Linus Torvalds List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 10/21/05 14:54, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > I'm trying to tell it like it is, in the hopes that you will eventually > learn the process, and be a good upstream maintainer we can all work with. Look how you're using "all", generalizing left and right. You just want to create this FUD and spread this FUD that I don't work well with anyone. Yep, this is a pretty low blow. While in fact did you talk to everyone I work with? I say, when people are losing it on the technical front, they try to attack personally and on political basis. Have a nice day, Luben -- http://linux.adaptec.com/sas/ http://www.adaptec.com/sas/