linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: dougg@torque.net, Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	jejb@steeleye.com
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	andrew.patterson@hp.com, "Moore, Eric Dean" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:53:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4359B7CF.5060509@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4359A9FE.4010503@pobox.com>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>> However, the block layer is used in the context of a
>> block device (and in some cases a char device).
>> If SAS domain discovery is done from the user space, and
>> the root file system is the far side of a SAS expander,
>> there are no suitable devices, just the SAS initiator
>> (HBA) which currently we cannot address via the block layer.

> Invalid example.  All of the methods listed -- request_queue, netlink, 
> chrdev, sysfs, ioctl -- will work just fine when the root filesystem is 
> on the far side of a SAS expander.  These are just methods of 
> communication, nothing more.
> 
> In your example -- userspace discovery required before root filesystem 
> can be found -- a program running from initrd/initramfs would create an 
> SMP device node, open it, and then proceed with the discovery and 
> configuration process, which in turn creates the device nodes necessary 
> to mount the root filesystem.
> 
> A request_queue is just a queue.  You are in complete control of who are 
> the producer(s) of requests, and who are consumer(s).


Since people are having such a tough time grasping the use of 
request_queue without an associated block device, here is a concrete 
example:  drivers/block/sx8.c.

sx8 creates a queue (grep for 'oob_q') specifically for handling 
discovery and configuration requests.  The only requests sent to this 
queue are I2O-ish management commands, never reads or writes.  Since 
they are management commands, these requests are NEVER associated with a 
block device.  Further, when sx8 discovery begins, sx8 block devices 
(and associated request_queues) simply don't exist.

Although sx8 management is entirely in-kernel, one could easily imagine 
how a userland interface (chrdev?) submits userspace commands into this 
queue.  Further, one can see how a host adapter could register one or 
more queues specifically for the transit of SMP commands.

NOTE:  THIS IS NOT AN ENDORSEMENT OF REQUEST QUEUES FOR SMP.  I merely 
wish to clear up misunderstandings about the block layer found in this 
thread.

It remains an open question whether the _complexity_ of this approach is 
more than is warranted for SMP.  But we've departed from that question, 
in this sub-thread :)

I merely illustrate that the block layer is being used _today_ for 
management commands.

	Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-22  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-20 15:25 [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs Moore, Eric Dean
2005-10-20 15:55 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-20 16:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-20 16:51   ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-20 17:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-20 17:22       ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-20 20:10         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21  8:16           ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-20 20:02       ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21  0:01         ` Andrew Patterson
2005-10-21  0:46           ` ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs) Jeff Garzik
2005-10-21  5:09             ` Mike Christie
2005-10-21  5:41             ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-10-21  6:19               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-21 18:37                 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 17:48             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 18:04               ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-21 18:12                 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 18:20                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-10-22  2:30                     ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-10-22  2:54                       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-22  3:53                         ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-10-22 17:14                           ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-22 17:49                             ` Francois Romieu
2005-10-22 16:51                         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 18:18               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-21 18:50                 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 18:54                   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-21 19:13                     ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 19:23                       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-21 22:20                         ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-21 19:22                     ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 19:39                       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-21 20:41                         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 21:12                           ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-21 21:24                             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 21:41                               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-21 22:14                                 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 22:43                                   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-22  9:26                                     ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-22 17:23                                       ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-22 10:42                                     ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-22 10:58                                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-22 15:28                                         ` Sergey Panov
2005-10-22 17:19                                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-22 17:38                                             ` Sergey Panov
2005-10-24 15:18                                               ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-22 18:27                                             ` Alan Cox
2005-10-24 13:51                                             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-24 15:41                                               ` Alan Cox
2005-10-24 15:14                                                 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-24 16:03                                                   ` Regala
2005-10-24 16:13                                                     ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-24 16:04                                                   ` Regala
2005-10-22 17:30                                         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-22 18:19                                           ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-22 17:49                                         ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-24 22:09                                           ` ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attachedPHYs) David Lang
2005-10-24 23:09                                             ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-22 11:12                                       ` David Lang
2005-10-22 17:39                                         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-22 17:41                                         ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-22 17:51                                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-22 18:21                                             ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-22 18:39                                             ` Sergey Panov
2005-10-22 13:27                                       ` ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs) Stefan Richter
2005-10-22 16:09                                     ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 19:41                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-10-21 19:48                         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 19:54                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-10-21 20:05                             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 19:46                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-21 19:50                         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21  9:06           ` [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-21 17:05             ` Andrew Patterson
2005-10-21 17:18               ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-21 18:57               ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21 17:32           ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-21  1:50 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-10-21  2:16   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-21  3:25     ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-10-21 18:04   ` Luben Tuikov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-21 20:31 ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs) Salyzyn, Mark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4359B7CF.5060509@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=Eric.Moore@lsil.com \
    --cc=andrew.patterson@hp.com \
    --cc=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@steeleye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luben_tuikov@adaptec.com \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).