From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:19:46 -0400 Message-ID: <435A82C2.3050509@pobox.com> References: <20051022173044.5903.qmail@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:36542 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751066AbVJVSUK (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:20:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20051022173044.5903.qmail@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: ltuikov@yahoo.com Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Stefan Richter , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Luben Tuikov , andrew.patterson@hp.com, Christoph Hellwig , "Moore, Eric Dean" , jejb@steeleye.com, Linus Torvalds Luben Tuikov wrote: > No offence Christoph, but who are you again? > > There is a clear reason why you among others do not want new architecture. > And that reason is (people) obsoletion. > > Such political stance cannot go on forever -- just look at History. > Sooner or later things change and they change radically. The question > is How prepared are you/we to cope with this (inevitable) change? THIS HAS FUCK-ALL TO DO WITH POLITICS. Its about working with the SCSI layer, not around it. Jeff