From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] marginalize HCIL a bit Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:45:49 -0400 Message-ID: <435AEB4D.1050602@pobox.com> References: <20051023013618.GA18201@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:54975 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751380AbVJWBpy (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:45:54 -0400 Received: from cpe-069-134-188-146.nc.res.rr.com ([69.134.188.146] helo=[10.10.10.88]) by mail.dvmed.net with esmtpsa (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ETUvo-00016T-HD for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:45:53 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20051023013618.GA18201@havoc.gtf.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > This patch series makes a tiny bit of progress on the marginalize-SPI > todo list. > > Patches: > 1) s/scsi_scan_target/spi_scan_target/ > 2) remove unused scsi_scan_single_target() > 3) add scsi_scan_target() > 4) kill all uses of spi_scan_target() > 5) kill spi_scan_target(), __spi_scan_target() > 6) misc cleanups hmmm. On second thought, I should probably leave __spi_scan_target() in there as a static function, to delete the now duplicated code in spi_scan_channel().