From: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] marginalize HCIL a bit
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:49:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <435D0283.40505@adaptec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1130081372.3437.33.camel@mulgrave>
On 10/23/05 11:29, James Bottomley wrote:
> There's an unaddressed lifetime problem in all of this: Originally the
> target object exists solely internally and has its lifetime managed by
> the mid-layer (it actually exists only as long as there are LUNs on it).
And this has always been wrong and I objected to this back when it
was introduced a few years ago.
> In your code cleanups, you keep the scsi_target_reap() function (which
> is what checks the children and tries to destroy the device if it
> doesn't find any) private (well, unexported). So, on return from your
> new scsi_scan_target(), the target pointer might be invalid (already
> freed) if you didn't take a reference to starget->dev. That's counter
> to the way lifetime management of objects usually works.
>
> I think the choices are
>
> 1. Make the target an explicit object (like it's peers scsi_device and
> scsi_host), so the layer creating it is responsible for managing it.
Which is exactly what I've been proposing: struct scsi_domain_device { };
similarly to how it is done in the SAS Transport Layer/Stack in the link
of my signature.
The new struct scsi_domain_device { } would be a logial (not imposed)
superclass around the transport's domain device representation.
The Transport Layer _registers_ a struct scsi_domain_device { };
and then SCSI Core scans for LUs and does LU bookkeeping.
LUs -> SCSI Core
SCSI Domain Targets -> Transport Layer around its own domain device
representation:
struct scsi_domain_device {
void *domain_device; /* opaque to SCSI Core */
struct list_head LU_list;
...
};
All of this functionality and infrastructure is present in the
SAS Stack and could be taken almost as is.
> This will get tricky, particularly as we'd need at least lun removal
> notifications so the creating layer can decide on destruction.
LU management is SCSI Core's task -- you'll get notified if
the _domain_ device went away, so that you can clean up your LU
representation.
See for example sas_discover_event(struct sas_port *, enum discover_event ev)
for event DISCE_PORT_GONE handled in the discover thread.
sas_unregister_domain_devices() eventually bubbles up to SCSI Core,
and dynamically allocated are handled by their release method (kobject
infrastructure).
Luben
--
http://linux.adaptec.com/sas/
http://www.adaptec.com/sas/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-24 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-23 1:36 [patch 0/6] marginalize HCIL a bit Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 1:37 ` [patch 1/6] SCSI HCIL: s/scsi_scan_target/spi_scan_target/ Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 1:38 ` [patch 2/6] SCSI HCIL: remove unused scsi_scan_single_target() Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 1:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-10-23 1:38 ` [patch 3/6] SCSI HCIL: add scsi_scan_target() Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 1:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-10-23 1:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 2:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-10-23 2:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 2:26 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-10-23 1:40 ` [patch 4/6] SCSI HCIL: kill all uses of spi_scan_target() Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 1:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-10-23 1:40 ` [patch 5/6] SCSI HCIL: kill spi_scan_target(), __spi_scan_target() Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 1:41 ` [patch 6/6] SCSI HCIL: misc cleanups Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 2:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-10-23 1:45 ` [patch 0/6] marginalize HCIL a bit Jeff Garzik
2005-10-23 15:29 ` James Bottomley
2005-10-24 15:49 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2005-10-24 16:50 ` James Bottomley
2005-10-24 17:18 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-24 20:28 ` James Bottomley
2005-10-24 20:41 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-10-24 21:12 ` James Bottomley
2005-10-24 22:38 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=435D0283.40505@adaptec.com \
--to=luben_tuikov@adaptec.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).