From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:13:28 -0400 Message-ID: <435D0828.4020307@adaptec.com> References: <4359440E.2050702@pobox.com> <43595275.1000308@adaptec.com> <435959BE.5040101@pobox.com> <43595CA6.9010802@adaptec.com> <43596070.3090902@pobox.com> <43596859.3020801@adaptec.com> <43596F16.7000606@pobox.com> <435A1793.1050805@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20051022105815.GB3027@infradead.org> <1129994910.6286.21.camel@sipan.sipan.org> <20051022171943.GA7546@infradead.org> <435CE6CA.4070704@adaptec.com> <1130168495.12873.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <435CFA5A.2030104@adaptec.com> <87vezm7vox.fsf@barad-dur.minas-morgul.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87vezm7vox.fsf@barad-dur.minas-morgul.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Regala Cc: Alan Cox , Christoph Hellwig , Sergey Panov , Stefan Richter , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Jeff Garzik , andrew.patterson@hp.com, Christoph Hellwig , "Moore, Eric Dean" , jejb@steeleye.com, Linus Torvalds List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 10/24/05 11:59, Regala wrote: > but refactoring can be done in incremental pieces, can't be ? > rewriting it from scratch is, in this very case, really for the sake > of self-pride and brain-masturbation. > Bravo > > This is not a really convincing example... > > -- > Mathieu Segaud They, the factory, wanted it rewritten from scratch, so that they can maintain and support it themselves. Luben -- http://linux.adaptec.com/sas/ http://www.adaptec.com/sas/