From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpfc:   Timer fix
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:45:37 -0500
Message-ID: <43A9A2D1.6040607@emulex.com>
References: <1134767813.5539.18.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net>	 <43A99351.4090100@emulex.com> <1135189555.3533.34.camel@mulgrave>
Reply-To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from emulex.emulex.com ([138.239.112.1]:58050 "EHLO
	emulex.emulex.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751173AbVLUSqD
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:46:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1135189555.3533.34.camel@mulgrave>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>

I would assume it's ok to wait until after 2.6.15.

-- james s

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 12:39 -0500, James Smart wrote:
>> Agreed.
> 
> Is this critical for 2.6.15 or can it wait until after 2.6.15 is
> released?
> 
> James
> 
> 
>