From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scsi scan bug when peripheral qualifier of 3 is returned
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 12:28:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BC13B3.9030604@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060104174019.GA3995@us.ibm.com>
Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:11:06AM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
>
>
>>But for SCSI_SCAN_TARGET_PRESENT bflags is not set. Is the correct fix
>>to move where bflagsp gets set in scsi_probe_and_add_lun so that it gets
>>set for the SCSI_SCAN_TARGET_PRESENT case, or should __scsi_scan_target
>>be passing scsi_sequential_lun_scan and possibly scsi_report_lun_scan
>>some default bflags values?
>
>
> It looks OK to me as-is, since bflags is also passed to and set in
> scsi_probe_lun(), right?
>
A blagfs variable gets set but it is not the same one passed into
scsi_probe_and_add_lun.
static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget,
uint lun, int *bflagsp,
{
struct scsi_device *sdev;
unsigned char *result;
int bflags,
scsi_probe_and_add_lun gets a *bflagsp passed to it as a function arg,
but then also decalres a bflags variable itself. It then passes
scsi_probe_lun() the bflags it declared and does this
res = scsi_add_lun(sdev, result, &bflags);
if (res == SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT) {
if (bflags & BLIST_KEY) {
sdev->lockable = 0;
scsi_unlock_floptical(sdev, result);
}
if (bflagsp)
*bflagsp = bflags;
}
so *bflagsp pointer only gets set if SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT was returned
by scsi_add_lun. For SCSI_SCAN_TARGET_PRESENT we do not even get to
scsi_add_lun, so for this case *bflagsp never gets set and
__scsi_scan_target gets zero. Previously, __scsi_scan_target would just
pass scsi_sequential_lun_scan the sparse blist flag, but now it passes zero.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-04 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-04 7:11 scsi scan bug when peripheral qualifier of 3 is returned Mike Christie
2006-01-04 17:40 ` Patrick Mansfield
2006-01-04 18:28 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2006-01-04 19:01 ` Patrick Mansfield
2006-01-04 20:31 ` Mike Christie
2006-01-04 22:25 ` Patrick Mansfield
2006-01-05 16:56 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43BC13B3.9030604@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox