linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mirko Benz <mirko.benz@web.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: dougg@torque.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA on mptsas performance
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 09:16:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4405584E.6070806@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44053A8E.6000206@pobox.com>

Hello,

As promised we have tested 3 Gb (aka SATA II) disks.
Configuration: LSI SAS3442X controller, Promise SAS JBOD, 12 disks 
Seagate SATA 80 GB

Tested with parallel dd invocations with bs=32k.
The results look better:

# disks    Read    AVG    Write    AVG
1    69    69,0    68    68,0
6    420    70,0    324    54,0
7    459    65,6    367    52,4
8    426    53,3    394    49,3
9    399    44,3    389    43,2
10    410    41,0    431    43,1
11    438    39,8    428    38,9
12    468    39,0    481    40,1

Available bandwidth is 4 * 3 Gb = 1.5 GB (4 lanes / external wide SAS 
port).
So there is still some room for improvement. Has anyone else a similar 
setup and can provide results?
Maybe with the Adaptec SAS controller?

Thanks,
Mirko

Jeff Garzik schrieb:
> Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>> If the SATA disk does 3 Gb/sec then yes but SATA-1 disks
>> run at 1.5 Gb/sec (and don't have NCQ). When a SAS HBA
>
> To further confuse things, "SATA-1", "SATA-2", etc. don't mean much at 
> all.  I recommend never using these terms.
>
> There are many disks that can do NCQ but not 3 Gb/sec, for example.
>
> Its best just to mention the existence of features, because there is 
> no __technical__ definition of "SATA 2" that one can test in software. 
> SATA 2 is just a set of features defined by marketing.
>
>     Jeff
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-01  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-14 16:02 SATA on mptsas performance Moore, Eric
2006-02-15  7:52 ` Mirko Benz
2006-03-01  3:30   ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-03-01  6:09     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-01  8:16       ` Mirko Benz [this message]
2006-03-01 17:55     ` Asgeir Eiriksson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-01 16:04 Moore, Eric
2006-02-13 14:01 Mirko Benz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4405584E.6070806@web.de \
    --to=mirko.benz@web.de \
    --cc=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).