From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Douglas Gilbert Subject: Re: Serial Attached SCSI, An Architecture For Linux Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:34:54 -0500 Message-ID: <44118E8E.8090708@torque.net> References: <20060310072722.96803.qmail@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1142000146.2876.51.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Reply-To: dougg@torque.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([205.233.218.70]:6119 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751333AbWCJOgm (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:36:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1142000146.2876.51.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: ltuikov@yahoo.com, linux-scsi Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 23:27 -0800, Luben Tuikov wrote: > >> Me, early Jan'06: Paper submitted. >>Linuxsymposium, 16 Feb 2006 : Paper approved. >>Linuxsymposium, date unknown: Silently moved to a BOF, I was never notified. >> Me, 9 Mar 2006 : BOF rejected by me because last year I did held a SAS BOF. >>Linuxsymposium, 9 Mar 2006 : moved back to a paper. >>Linuxsymposium, 9 Mar 2006 : paper rejected. > > > > I think you mistyped linux-scsi when you actually wanted to send this to > the OLS list? So you would like dissenting voices to speak in forums that nobody listens to? Am I to believe that nobody who reads this list had a hand in the above miscarriage? In my reply to Luben's original post, I cc-ed the linux-kernel list. Now I can turn off the internet and play with my new SAS box :-) Doug Gilbert