From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: "Cameron, Steve" <Steve.Cameron@hp.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HBA self selection
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:58:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <443E9141.6030901@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5CCF5F0F2514664CBE20FD24BCE17614044BF8@cceexc17.americas.cpqcorp.net>
Cameron, Steve wrote:
> Noticed in scsi_scan.c (2.6.15.2 kernel...)
>
> 1336 static void __scsi_scan_target(struct device *parent, unsigned int chann el,
> 1337 unsigned int id, unsigned int lun, int rescan)
> 1338 {
> 1339 struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(parent);
> 1340 int bflags = 0;
> 1341 int res;
> 1342 struct scsi_target *starget;
> 1343
> 1344 if (shost->this_id == id)
> 1345 /*
> 1346 * Don't scan the host adapter
> 1347 */
> 1348 return;
> 1349
>
> There exist some target devices which depend on the adapter being
> able to do self selection. The HP MSA30 presents a processor device
> at ID 7, for instance.
>
> The processor device at ID 7 will generally not be accessible, because
> the HBA is generally at this ID. The processor device doesn't care that the
> HBA is at id 7. He says, "hmm, the adapter is talking to himself,
> that means, he's talking to me." It's just a way to put a processor
> device on the bus without really "using up" a scsi id, since there
> are only a few of them.
>
> This used to work, I'm pretty sure. Could do
> "echo scsi add-single-device 0 0 7 0 > /proc/scsi/scsi" and
> the processor device would show up. Now it doesn't.
Steve,
I suppose the lk 2.6 equivalent of:
# echo "0 7 0" > /sys/class/scsi_host/host<n>/scan
doesn't work either? [The reason I ask is that the
new technique works for finding "well known" lus.]
Doug Gilbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-13 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-13 14:58 HBA self selection Cameron, Steve
2006-04-13 15:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-04-13 16:13 ` Cameron, Steve
2006-04-13 17:47 ` James Bottomley
2006-04-13 18:35 ` Cameron, Steve
2006-04-13 20:06 ` James Bottomley
2006-04-13 20:42 ` Mike Anderson
2006-04-13 21:01 ` Cameron, Steve
2006-04-13 17:58 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2006-04-13 18:35 ` Cameron, Steve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=443E9141.6030901@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=Steve.Cameron@hp.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox