From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] libata support for async scanning
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:26:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4466872C.5010201@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060513131639.GT12272@parisc-linux.org>
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:16:46AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> I don't think SATA target scanning occupies a huge amount of boot time,
>>> however it will currently force all async scanners to complete before it
>>> scans. The Rolls-Royce solution would be somethinkg akin to the new
>>> scsi_scan_host(), but I don't think that's necessaary. This patch just
>>> acknowledges that async scanning exists and will permit the drive
>>> additions to finish some time after libata has triggered the probe.
>> This seems to add needless complexity.
>
> It doesn't, honest.
>
>> The internal probe is complete before the loop begins. Thus,
>> ata_scan_scan_host() is simply walking data structures in memory (due to
>> SCSI simulator) for ATA devices, and for ATAPI devices parallelism is
>> largely inadvisable :) Its overkill, and in some rare cases could make
>> debugging more annoying.
>
> It won't be parallelised with respect to itself, just with respect to
> other scsi scans. See my message
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=114735805518594&w=2
>
> Without this patch (on top of that one), libata's calls to
> scsi_scan_target() will block until all asynchronous scans have
> completed (see the conditional call to scsi_complete_async_scans() in
> scsi_scan_target()). With this patch, libata will scan the targets
> in parallel with other scsi hosts scanning their targets. It will still
> block, but it'll do it later, when it calls scsi_finish_async_scan().
>
> Hmm. Maybe I can improve the API such that scsi_finish_async_scan()
> won't make it block ...
>
> Anyway, the point here is actually to make your life easier. If someone
> has a lot of scsi hosts and libata doesn't have this patch, all of a
> sudden people are going to be asking you why libata's taking so long to
> initialise. And if you debug it, you'll find it's sleeping in
> scsi_complete_async_scans().
First of all, let's establish the large I-dont-care factor on my part.
I think its an academic exercise that none will notice, with respect to
libata, but I won't NAK your patch...
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-14 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-13 5:05 [RFC] libata support for async scanning Matthew Wilcox
2006-05-13 5:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-13 13:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-05-14 1:26 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4466872C.5010201@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).