From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Denny Page Subject: Re: scsi negotiation problem on aic79xx (39320A) in 2.6.14 Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:12:30 -0700 Message-ID: <446F4DFE.6010201@cococafe.com> References: <20051114224512.GF9905@mathom.us> <20060323180909.GD15140@mathom.us> <1143139044.3415.26.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <20060324122715.GG15140@mathom.us> <446EA4B5.2030507@cococafe.com> <1148133061.3529.3.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <1148134836.3529.5.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.cococafe.com ([64.142.30.235]:39626 "EHLO mail.cococafe.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751439AbWETRMl (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2006 13:12:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1148134836.3529.5.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Ok, thanks. It will be a couple of days before I can do the test. Denny James Bottomley wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 08:51 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: >> On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 22:10 -0700, Denny Page wrote: >>> Setting the xfer speed in the bios does not appear to affect the >>> result with >>> the 2.6.16 kernel. >> That's odd ... the code to recognise the BIOS settings went into 2.6.16. >> What does /proc/scsi/aic79xx/ say? > > Oh ... actually, I should have traversed the tree rather than going by > commit date. Apparently the BIOS code didn't make it in until post > 2.6.16, so if you check 2.6.17-rc4, it should work. > > James > >