From: Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>
To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com
Cc: Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>, Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>,
Gary Hagensen <gwh@sgi.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, Jim Nead <jnead@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: fc transport creates second set of targets for devices in an "md"
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:22:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4489BC48.9040208@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4489B9A5.5030104@sgi.com>
I tried using a mounted file system on a single device. Same test,
disable / wait / enable.
There was no activity on the file system following the mount until
after the enable.
duck /root# ls /sdj1
5:0:13:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
Buffer I/O error on device sdj1, logical block 516
Buffer I/O error on device sdj1, logical block 517
Buffer I/O error on device sdj1, logical block 518
Buffer I/O error on device sdj1, logical block 519
EXT3-fs error (device sdj1): ext3_readdir: directory #2 contains a hole at offset 0
Aborting journal on device sdj1.
5:0:13:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
Buffer I/O error on device sdj1, logical block 0
lost page write due to I/O error on sdj1
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs error (device sdj1): ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal
Remounting file system read-only
It would be really nice if the file system wouldn't be rendered
dead and require manual intervention following the scenario
of kicking a cable and plugging it back in after the dev_loss_tmo
expires.
I think I'm leaning toward wishing that the kernel could do a
better job of reconnecting devices following these little "accidents".
Mike
Michael Reed wrote:
>
> Michael Reed wrote:
>> James Smart wrote:
>>> The data that would be most interesting is a recursive listing of the
>>> device via the /sys/devices tree. This would show the host, rports,
>>> targets, and sdevs. Getting a copy of this both before, when missing,
>>> and after they are reconnected. The additional contents to look at
>>> is : contents of /sys/class/fc_remote_ports.
>> I'll capture data and post later today.
>>
>
> Attached. ls_no_md.tar.bz2 and ls_with_md.tar.bz2
>
> I noticed that more than just the devices associated with the
> md were reassigned in the ls_with_md.tar output.
>
> Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-09 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-08 19:13 fc transport creates second set of targets for devices in an "md" Michael Reed
2006-06-08 19:57 ` James Smart
2006-06-09 16:26 ` Michael Reed
2006-06-09 18:10 ` Michael Reed
2006-06-09 18:22 ` Michael Reed [this message]
2006-06-08 20:19 ` Mike Christie
2006-06-09 16:35 ` Michael Reed
2006-06-09 19:34 ` Mike Christie
2006-06-09 19:52 ` James Smart
2006-06-09 0:43 ` James Bottomley
2006-06-09 16:35 ` Michael Reed
2006-06-09 19:23 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4489BC48.9040208@sgi.com \
--to=mdr@sgi.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=gwh@sgi.com \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=jnead@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox