From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>
Cc: James.Smart@Emulex.Com, Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>,
Gary Hagensen <gwh@sgi.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, Jim Nead <jnead@sgi.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: fc transport creates second set of targets for devices in an "md"
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:34:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4489CD4D.4040505@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4489A34C.8040007@sgi.com>
Michael Reed wrote:
>
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> Michael Reed wrote:
>>> I created an md device on two fibre channel disks, sde and sdf.
>>> I then disabled the switch port to which the hba is connected.
>>> After the remote port time out messages, I re-enabled the switch
>>> port. Three things happen that are weird. First, two unexpected
>>> responses while scanning. Second, the creation of sdm and
>>> sdn. Third, the md device remains inaccessible.
>>>
>>> I don't think this is working the way it's intended to. I
>>> suspect it will cause big problems for multi-path volume managers
>>> in a fail back situation.
>>>
>> Even if the rport is removed and the devices under it are removed, md
>> can still have a reference to the device so the memory does not
>> disappear on it (MD still thinks the device is there but scsi says it is
>> gone basically). Because of this, when you plug in the cable again and a
>> new rport is created sd.c can end up allocating another sdX value.
>>
>
> So, how about a callback to the driver, md, with the reference so that it
> can release said reference?
>
Look at how DM's userspace multipath tools handle this. Last I looked it
could handle the hotplug events that are fired when a scsi device is
removed or added so as long as you set something like queue_if_no_path
or no_path_retry high enough then it could work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-09 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-08 19:13 fc transport creates second set of targets for devices in an "md" Michael Reed
2006-06-08 19:57 ` James Smart
2006-06-09 16:26 ` Michael Reed
2006-06-09 18:10 ` Michael Reed
2006-06-09 18:22 ` Michael Reed
2006-06-08 20:19 ` Mike Christie
2006-06-09 16:35 ` Michael Reed
2006-06-09 19:34 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2006-06-09 19:52 ` James Smart
2006-06-09 0:43 ` James Bottomley
2006-06-09 16:35 ` Michael Reed
2006-06-09 19:23 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4489CD4D.4040505@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=gwh@sgi.com \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=jnead@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdr@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox